CHARLIE KIRK CONSPIRACY.

CONSPARACY OR NOT
TWO DAYS BEFORE 
SHOOTING THIS 
BOOK WAS GOING 
to be published at AMAZON,
then PULLED OFF.

First of ALL. Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to be murdered in cold blood. I hate violence, it belongs nowhere in civil politics and debate. BUT THERE LINGERS a LOT of QUESTIONS. AS of September 11, the murderer is still unknown, with American authorities pursuing a manhunt. Despite no public information being available as to the background, whereabouts, or motives of the killer, in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, large numbers of so-called activists posted online claiming that the assailant was not a lone individual, but rather a body determined to silence Kirk. Whatever 😏 the case , Kirk shooting incident is mired in several weeks of gun violence all over the United States.I want yall to compare this shooting to the previous attempts we've seen that have been done by angry lunatic citizens. They were dead or in custody in minutes.  Compare to other school or campus shootings, we know who the shooter is in hours usually. This is something entirely different. NOW THE BIGGEST "Conspiracy?" You mean the most obvious explanation? Not on mainstream media.  It was a false flag. It's so painfully obvious. The right-wing outrage machine was running on fumes, and they needed a martyr to gin up sympathy and fear before the next election. Think about it: who benefits from this? The right gets to scream about "violent left-wing terrorists," fundraise off a "brave patriot," and justify their own calls for violence. They'll find some convenient patsy, and suddenly every conservative will forget about the dozens of actual right-wing terrorists who've been shooting up places for years.

Blaming Israel?.

Charlie Kirk was pro-Israel by virtue of getting all his talking points directly from Trump. Yet his past statements are laced with contradiction to that image. He used anti-Semitic tropes, from claims of Jewish “control” over cultural life to blaming “Jewish donors” for fuelling social and political ills. The tension between pro-Israel branding and rhetoric echoing well-known antisemitic stereotypes has been noted by Jewish and conservative commentators alike. Shortly after Israel began its attack in Gaza in October 2023, Kirk claimed that Jewish philanthropy funding American universities was effectively “subsidising your own demise by supporting institutions that breed anti-Semites and endorse genocidal killers” — a framing that shifted blame onto Jewish donors themselves. Charlie Kirk was a devote Israel supporter who visited the country on several occasions, he was invited two weeks ago (as per Netanyahu’s recent X post). 3 days ago, his interview with Ben Shapiro took an unexpected turn with him asking hardball questions on Israel. A shift from Kirk is not as easy for Israel to write off, considering his status as an “ally” of Israel. It is clear that Mossad took his questions and call for the decoupling of Jewish donors from American politics as a threat.  It’s far more likely a right winger pissed that Charlie was such a craven lap dog and all the sudden started telling people to shut up about Epstein.Upon reflection, yeah. I agree. After a few ore hours, my opinion now leans inside job, but cant find a motive. Stumped. Edit: I do think its particularly weird that Netanyahu put up a statement so quickly. Aswell as other major Isreali political figures. Yeah weird how an American gets shot in Utah and the Prime Minister of Israel was one of the first ones to react. Charlie Kirk was probably getting funded or given gifts from the Israel government to push some talking points. I would be really surprised if the shooter is mossad-affiliated because the US government has already came out and said they have the footage of the assassin.Normally they would delete the footage instead. It wouldn’t surprise me that this was a false-flag. Not because Charlie Kirk was turning against Israel, but because the MAGA movement needed a martyr after it has been losing credibility due to the Epstein issue, martial law being imposed, Trump clearly groveling Israel, etc. and so he may have been sacrificed for that purpose (same reason as Trumps’ staged assassination attempts but he is too important for the grift and another clearly fake “assassination attempt” would be too obvious/suspicious). No doubt this will pump some life into the movement and bring a lot of those fools back into the fold believing they are “fighting the deep state” again.

The LONE GUNMAN THEORY.

Utah resident Tyler Robinson.
a Mormon who was 
radicalized by a Satanic 
group? OR PARENTS 
who had Guns?

The lone perpetrator suspected of firing the single gunshot that killed Kirk, 31, apparently from a distant rooftop sniper’s nest on campus. Officials have identified the person accused of fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk as 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson. Utah Governor Spencer Cox said at a press conference on Friday morning that investigators arrested and identified Robinson after analyzing surveillance footage, interviewing Robinson's family members and reviewing online messages between Robinson and his roommate. Charlie Kirk shooter. Does anybody else get the feeling that the shooter was a straight white Mormon male, who was trying to cause further political divide by blaming the shooting on the left? He purposefully engraved the bullets with left meme culture in and then left them to be found by the FBI. So that the media would declare it was a transgender leftist shooter. Similar to how the US government made a martyr out of the twin towers to justify desert storm and take media attention away from sketchy government activity. SATANIC CONNECTION? Honestly there needs to be some kind of Information campaign/movement for people to recognize terrorgram/764 related crimes and behavior. Their accelerationism clearly works looking at people in this and other threads. Far right extremism from these groups is designed to divide and terrorize and cause social unrest, and it will work if people start blaming each other for the movement of a violent extremist group.  Nothing is Adding UP. The UVU campus allowed open carry? If that's true, that's insane. How can any young adult who grew up doing active shooter drills in school -- maybe even lived through a school shooting -- concentrate in class when they can see guns hanging off their classmates' belts? Something about the Charlie Kirk shooter footage isn’t adding up . • Nobody on the grassy knoll. But this Charlie Kirk thing? Something feels off. I’ve been watching the news coverage, and here’s what I don’t understand: • The video shows the guy running across a rooftop, lowering himself down, and dropping about a full story onto the grass. Then he runs off through a park and parking lot. • Later, investigators say they found the rifle — an old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle — in a wooded area some distance away. • Problem: in the video, he doesn’t appear to have a rifle with him when he jumps. Think about it: if he had dropped off that roof with a full-length rifle stuffed down his pants or up into his shirt, he’d have absolutely broken his leg. The only way it makes sense is if he had it disassembled in a backpack. But that also doesn’t make sense — old bolt-action .30-06 rifles aren’t exactly “take-down friendly.” They don’t break apart quickly, especially not under pressure. So how exactly did he get that rifle from the roof to the woods? And another thing — watch the video closely. The camera pans and follows his every move in real time. This is supposedly before anyone even knew who or what to look for. Was someone manually moving the camera to track him? Or was that just coincidental coverage? I’m not saying there’s some giant cover-up here, but man… the whole sequence is weird. The rifle doesn’t quite fit the escape footage, and the camera tracking feels a little too perfect. CONSPARACIES WILL NEVER END ON THIS PARTICULAR SHOOTING.  Most "left leaning" people in the U.S. are from places where seeing a gun is an anomaly and the idea of touching one is legit scary, and most red states are filled to the brim with dads that teach their sons to shoot guns soon after they learn to walk, on this very basic reasoning alone you'd think MAGA would maybe shut up before the guy is found out, c'mon... basic statistics at play here. It's a crazy coincidence that every attack on conservatives is from a conservative... Far-right Mormons might be about to find out that they're not as welcome among the ranks of far-right evangelical Christians as they thought they were. If it turns out this kid was not far-right-wing, it would not follow that he was far-left. In Utah, there are plenty of people who detest all political parties equally, even if their ideology has somewhat in common with right/conservative groups. There are extremists here that have no political affiliation, and that categorically reject the government no matter what party is in control. There's a small group of them that live in the desert out southwest of the town of Nephi that even the police avoid (not the AUB polygamist group that lives just off the freeway at Santaquin, this is a different group). Trump was on Fox News and said his “minister” tipped off a US Marshall friend, and then the dad convinced him to turn himself in. I’m going to assume they meant bishop, so he must have been active or at least going to church with his family 🤔 kind of uncanny if you think about it too much Considering how much every type on media platform empowers "taking down the fascist"... and then when it happens... lol