Sunday, December 6, 2015

San Bernardino "terror". about IS & Gun Control.

Government "denial". How the Fed's want us to believe we are "safe".
It's interesting how the media was slow (1)>> AS TO IDENTIFY the mass shooters , I have only seen them admit to "investigate it a possible example of" and "looking into the possibility of it being"...You know, a variation of the nonapology apology. AGAIN as to not to offend a certain minority group.This Obama  administration is caught in the lie that the US is safe from IS attacks. There is so much to ponder as "speculate" that yeas indeed that there are terror cells in the United States , but much of IT is in LINE with the morphology of Alex Jones and Presidential Hopeful Donald Trump .The Obama Administration and liberal media were completely baffled this week after two Muslims, (6)>> Syed Farook and his bride Tashfeen Malik, gunned down 14 Americans in cold blood. Yesterday, the FBI publicly announced that their investigation into the mass shooting in San Bernardino had become a terrorism probe. After discovering a Facebook posting by Tashfeen Malik pledging allegiance to IS the FBI took over the investigation. During the presser, the FBI also said that they had some evidence that Malik and Syed Farook had been in contact with “foreign terrorist organizations”. After assuring the American public last week that IS was contained and that there were no known plots on the homeland, the IS-linked couple slaughtered 14 at a California Christmas party.It took two days for the (2)>>Obama administration to admit that this was Islamic terrorism.Would the FBI have done so if they didn’t know there was (4)>> IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE out there someplace which would come back to be egg on their faces if they mislabel this incident? Didn’t Obama say  (3)>>NO TERRORIST INCIDENTS ON US SOIL while he was in the Whitehouse? Wasn’t that a campaign promise of the Nobel prize winner in chief? The Administration didn’t want him looking bad and IF they could have labeled it something else, they would have. Look at the previous incidences of TERRORISM on US soil.. Fort Hood, for instance – such things have been mislabeled in the past.. but the terrorists wanted to make sure it would not be on this one. On this one the terrorists forced them to say the word TERRORISM. It was the go-pro which forced them to admit it, IMHO. THAT was why they used it, and they will do so in the future, also, to make sure the Government tells it like it is and doesn’t hide behind false excuses like “mental illness” or “workplace violence.” THIS AGAIN brings us to the ISSUE of GUN CONTROL . It will take someone with a more extensive background in psychotherapy and the human mind to explain why the president and so many of his allies are going through life with blinders on. Remember how after the Paris shootings he suggested it was all somehow tied to global climate change which, parenthetically, he still calls a greater threat to the future of mankind than the activities of al-Qaida, the Islamic State group and the other groups who are using a radicalized version of Islam to recruit combatants into their army of death? Hillary Clinton forcefully defended herself Friday from Republican criticism about her push for comprehensive gun control legislation shortly after the deaths of 14 people in San Bernardino, given that investigators are now labeling the shooting a terrorist attack.In New Hampshire Thursday, Clinton called directly for gun control, telling audiences throughout the state that the shooting proved the government needs "to take action now" on guns. At the time, the shootings' link to terrorism was tenuous.
THE GUN CONTROL ARGUMENT: I know this is controversial. It don't make sense but I should
write about . Why is it that the " Librals aka Democrats " want stricter gun control ? If you think hard and it would make sense that the Conservative Republicans should be the ones who would want gun control since they would be for family values , but no .... With all the shootings , their Christian counseling would look at guns as evil in our society . So the  (7)>>Democrats who are Liberals , who are for legalizing everything so far would be the party for less gun control ??? Makes any sense . We have our nations political parties mixed up .... The right to own a firearm is a Constitutional right.   The no-fly list is a bureaucratic construct.  We do not deny Constitutional rights based on the say-so of a bureaucrat.  More to the point, we saw how well our inept government does not protect us from Islamist lunatics who did apparently have contacts with some bad actors.   Want to bet how that lead will pan out? The latest mind-numbing puzzle: The GOP is blocking a law that would prevent known and suspected terrorists from buying guns. The authors of this bill is a list of who's-who in anti-gun in the government. They threw explosives into the bill even though explosives are not available to the general public in the first place. They probably put that in the bill so that it would appear to be "common sense", a favorite liberal phrase. This bill was anything BUT common sense.  This is not just a what-if scenario. The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office recently released a report showing that from 2004 to 2014, people on terrorism watch lists successfully purchased guns no fewer than 2,043 times. Yes, you read that right. Federal authorities say that the two assault rifles and two handguns used in the San Bernardino massacre were all purchased legally in the United States — two of them by someone who’s now under investigation.” That’s the word from the ATF. As Nick wrote earlier today, to two black rifles were California-legal, but had been altered in violation of the state’s Brady Campaign A-rated common sense gun laws. Who could have possibly predicted that Joey and Janey Jihadi would have disregarded the Golden State’s labyrinthine gun control regime in their preparations to commit mass murder? The news here is . . .the third individual. A straw purchaser! Again, in blatant disregard for both federal and state laws! There are 700,000 people on the terrorist watch list, and when these people tried to legally purchase guns, they had a success rate of 91%."Membership in a terrorist organization does not prohibit a person from possessing firearms or explosives under current federal law," the GAO warned back in 2010. You think by now that SOMETHING has to be done ? On a more serious note, there was apparently a compromise proposed in the form of a 72-hour delay in the purchase of a firearm to allow time for judicial review. Personally, I think this is fairly reasonable and I would support it. But it failed to pass. 

IS/ISIS/ISIL/Daesh "headed" to Oblivion.

Civilians and Civil Defence members work at a
 site hit by what activists said were airstrikes by forces loyal to
 President Bashar al-Assad in Raqqa,
controlled by Islamic
State, the would be caliphate capital
has been in ruins ever since.
It's inevitable . AND I'am of the opinion . I am going to predict that the Islamic State has a few years left . The would be caliphate is headed for annihilation . The more it commits other acts of terrorism against western powers . The vary more powerful nations will unite to destroy it. The "b headings" , and suicide bombings. The vary Un-Muslim like behavior of killing fellow Muslims , radical extremist idology is bringing doom on the caliphate   . The Islamic State’s vaunted exercise in state-building appears to be crumbling as living conditions deteriorate across the territories under its control, exposing the shortcomings of a group that devotes most of its energies to fighting battles and enforcing strict rules. Services are collapsing, prices are soaring, and medicines are scarce in towns and cities across the “caliphate” proclaimed in Iraq and Syria by the Islamic State, residents say, belying the group’s boasts that it is delivering a model form of governance for Muslims. There are also signs of falling morale among at least some of the fighters, whose expectations of quick and easy victories have been squashed by U.S.-led airstrikes (RUSSIAN, JORDANIAN ). A notice distributed in Raqqa in December called on fighters who were shirking their duties to report to the front lines, and a new police force was created to go house to house to root them out. But the deterioration is undermining at least one important aspect of the Islamic State’s self-proclaimed identity — as a state, dedicated to reviving the 7th-century caliphate that once ruled the Muslim world. Governing is as central to that goal as the military conquests that occurred as Islamic State fighters swept through much of Syria and Iraq over the past year. As much as half the city could well be flattened in the battle. So once the shooting ends, any liberating military would quickly confront a significant infrastructure and refugee problem. This invariably would lead to the second big conundrum: the critical effort of providing an effective government.As we have seen throughout history, especially concerning learning about the young and the dumb, it is a lot easier and a lot more fun to lead or fight or play at revolution with destruction, than it is to run and country and build things and be productive at hard real jobs and boring chores. The tribe might unite to fight, but collectively they are not that bright, and after they and their friends win, thing never turn out right.Who would rule Raqqa the day after it is liberated? The partners must start focusing on what might happen the day after liberation long before that day arrives. 

(1)>> AS TO IDENTIFY . Doesn't take them long to talk motive when they think it's a Christian involved. As a matter of fact, what rag was reporting the attack was taking place 20 blocks away from a planned parenthood building? They were setting up their narrative for a Christian attacker, they had to drop that pretty quickly when planned parenthood was 20 blocks away and it was becoming obvious it was muzzies involved. (2)>>Obama administration.  Perhaps we should become hypervigilant whenever our govt. officials downplay any national security threat...Note how the (above) video opens with the November 18th FBI statement declaring they are unaware of ANY CREDIBLE threat of a Paris type of terrorist attack. FOUR DAYS LATER, San Bernardino experiences a jihadist attack.Recall also:...hours before the Paris terror attack,Obama declared ISIL contained. Questions were raised about the timing of that declaration wondering if it signaled IS/ISIS/ISIL/Daesh to pull the trigger.Kerry's declaration MSNBC: al qaeda 'neutralized'.
 (3)>>NO TERRORIST INCIDENTS ON US SOIL .Unfortunately, the idiots who work at these propaganda outfits (which are nothing more than a media wing of the Obama White House) won't get it until some Jihadis storm their newsrooms, execute everyone who isn't Muslim, and die in a shoot-out with police while screaming Allahu Akbar. And even THEN they'll still be baffled as to what possibly could have motivated peaceful Muslims to become radicalize. (4)>> IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE . Its' BAFFLING that the FBI may have botched the investigation . Retired New York City Police Department detective Harry Houck said he watched in disbelief as members of the media ransacked the home of the husband and wife responsible for killing 14 in Wednesday’s San Bernardino terrorist attack. Everyone of them should be locked up for destroying a crime scene. Tampering of evidence. Loss of evidence. Trespassing. Thinking about it, the blood in the streets probably hasn’t even been washed away yet.  Just another reason why you can’t trust today’s media. (6)>> Syed Farook and his bride Tashfeen Malik. The Family of...The shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 27,Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik called ‘quiet’ and ‘religious’; left their young child with Farook’s mother in nearby Redlands on Wednesday morning before dressing in “assault clothing,” and crashing the party (literally). A subsequent shootout with authorities left both suspects dead. The couple used a DPMS model and a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 along with two handguns, a llama and a Smith & Wesson. The rifles, two .223s, are capable of piercing bulletproof vests. The weapons were purchased legally.The couple left their 6-month-old girl with Farook's mother Wednesday, saying they had a doctor's appointment.The grandmother became concerned when she saw reports of the shooting and couldn't reach Farook. So far the Media and family of the shooters are at bit at odds to the reality of not NOTICING anything strange . He had two sisters and a brother, according to a brother-in-law, Farhan Khan. The brother, Syed Raheel Farook, Syed Rizwan Farook was a “normal person” who kept halal “just like any other Muslim,” Mr. Khan said. “Why would he do something like that?” he said of the shooting. “I have absolutely no idea. I am in shock.” Saira Khan, the sister of Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the suspects in the shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., said she was deeply saddened by the attack and had no indication of her brother’s plans. So Are we to draw any "sympathy" ? (7)>>Democrats who are Liberals , who are for legalizing everything so far would be the party for less gun control ???. And if the Middle East has taught us anything, it is that a bunch of people running around with hand weapons can accomplish quite a lot even in this age. Throw in the fact that we have a lot of patriotic guys with excellent military training, and I think Obama is right to fear the armed citizen.

No comments:

Post a Comment