Friday, May 17, 2013

The Big e-mail deal.

President Obama can't take all the Blame
on everything as of yet.......
The scandal with the Benghazi e-mails seems to be getting bigger . A few Nights ago I was tuning in to hear the Micheal Savage show  on the radio. Savage said something that drew my attention . He said that "some one from within was leaking things out." Sure , he might be right . I am  quoting Savage not  in in verbatim,but (my emphasis).   Honestly I am at the point that I don't believe either the Democrats  along with Obama , or the Republicans  . All the wire taps , and all the memos, typos and e-mails . It's Washington  D.C.'s crazy circus . Yes , they or whom ever want it to be like Watergate . Soon we all be hearing about possible "wire taps" on Tea Party organizations . Worse still to come  " Arms sales to Syrian Rebels scandal " . With Obama taking the hit .   Attorney General Eric Holder appoints two U.S. attorneys to lead a pair of investigations into possible unauthorized disclosures of classified information. Major Garrett of CBS News, that Republicans were behind the false leaks. explicit confirmation  ? CNN has obtained an e-mail sent by a top aide to President Barack Obama about White House reaction to the deadly attack last September 11 on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that apparently differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations. The actual e-mail from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show that whomever leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House was primarily concerned with the State Department's desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department. Either case . My view these actions are no way taking the emphasis away from the Obama administration . I feel that there was "failure" on the Presidents part , and the State Department in regards to Libya . If you all remember  Press Secretary who in response to a question asking “What happened at Benghazi” said at 9/14/2012 press conference ” We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive.” and again . In the same press conference CARNEY said: 

CARNEY: We also need to understand that this is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response not to United States policy, and not to, obviously, the administration, or the American people, but it is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be be reprehensible and disgusting. That in no way justifies any violent reaction to it, but this is not a case of protests directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy, this is in response to a video that is offensive to Muslims.

Nothing changes my mind . I think was also have too much government corruption in the United States  that either political party can't  be "trusted" . All the investigations are all just going to get bigger , and perhaps they are all hype or-castrated by whom ever is behind the "leaks" and "misinformation" .

There are also two "stories" circulating about the Late Chris Stevens  that are Equally disturbing 
The American Ambassador killed last Sept. 11 in a brutal attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi refused offers for more security at the compound, according to a bombshell report.

Christopher Stevens, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, who was killed along with three other Americans after terrorists stormed the mission, twice turned down offers from senior military officials for additional security at the facility, McClatchy news services reported.   (the Other version ) Hours before US Ambassador Christopher Stevens died in a terrorist attack in Libya, he sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton a cable warning that local militias were threatening to take away security officers guarding the US diplomats. The cable, which Stevens submitted on the morning of Sept. 11, 2012, relayed the warning that Libyan militia “would not continue to guarantee security in Benghazi, a critical function they asserted they were currently providing.” Militia leaders had previously expressed anger at US support of a certain candidate for Libyan prime minister and consequentially planned to extract their security.

No comments:

Post a Comment