![]() |
| The Rift Between MTG and Trump, the Shutdown, the support for endless wars has probably set MAGA to implode. |
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
(1)>>MAGA may have Imploded. MAGA isn't imploding from within. Yes, there is some infighting happening, but until the Republican party reps and senators abandon MAGA, it will remain. I'm not saying it won't happen, but we need to atleast wait until the midterms are over before we start making posts about MAGA dying off. Republicans have, for a long time, made it clear that they believe that the services the federal government provides should be greatly reduced. The current government shutdown was/is never going to end with Democrats getting the things they've been pushing for (namely the ACA subsidy extensions) because Republicans have no incentive to cave to any such demands. In fact, they've made it quite clear that they're totally fine with literally starving people and crippling many basic public functions.Or even think about it from the other direction: why do Democrats care about the ACA susbisdies being extended? Because access to healthcare is a basic need and many people will die as a result of not being able to afford basic treatment for any number of injuries and illness. But isn't the same thing true about Republicans currently blocking SNAP benefits (i.e., access to affordable food)? They have been pretty vocal about this being something they want (and it's literally outlined in Project 2025).So, on the one one hand - Democrats can hold out on the slim hope that Republicans will eventually cave (which they won't because they are uncaring sociopaths) but in the meantime, people (especially children, disabled, amd elderly) will literally starve and die. That's on top of many public workers being pushed closer to poverty because they are either fired, furloughed, not being paid, or resigning - all of which has ripple effects on the agencies they work for being able to operate effectively. Plus, the longer the shutdown goes on, the more likely Republicans will be to end the filibuster, which would allow them to push through far, far worse legislation with minimal resistance.On the other hand, they can sign onto Republican's bill and people will die because they can't afford medical care. Plus, Republicans will be shown that their terroristic threats on the American people will work in the future as well (which, let's be honest, they've known that for a long time). It sounds like a dammed if you do, dammed if you don't kind of situation - Republicans are going to get people killed no matter what and they don't care.(2)>>Democrats have drawn a line in the sand.
HOLY CRAP! It's now been exposed that 14 days into the federal government shutdown - Democrat moderates were about to REOPEN everything, but Chuck Schumer ordered them into a 'backroom' and said "NO. HOLD OUT." "A group of moderates came to Schumer 2 weeks in and said, 'we're ready to reopen the government.' He said 'no, hold out!' He said if anyone tried to reopen the government, he'd stand against them!" "He caused the pain. He pushed the pain through!" Despicable, Chuck. You disgust America! To make matters worse Trump can’t even rely on corporate media to get Trump fatigue and stop covering him like last time, because there is now an exploding left wing online media industry which is covering his every move and not letting it fade into the background. This in turn is giving focus to protestors and even giving the do nothing Democratic leadership a hard time keeping their control over the party who wants young Democrats with bold Ideas instead of the old guard. Exciting times. (3)>>THE ENTIRE TIME and could have reassured people from the start that they wouldn’t go hungry. 43 million Americans on SNAP means 1 in 8 people are on Food Stamps. I think it's a balance of electoral interest vs actual long-term policy goals. It's one thing to have SNAP die for a month or two, it's another to make healthcare entirely unaffordable for 10 million people for the foreseeable future. Plus, politically, it's better to be able to say "we fought tooth and nail against rising premiums, even shut down the government" than simply "the other side did this and we watched them fuck you over." I think the sheer act of forcing a government shutdown is the best way for Dems to position themselves as having the moral high ground. And in fact, making it the hill they die on and forcing Republicans to negotiate or kill the filibuster would have been the optimal strategy in my opinion. Because next year they'd be able to say they did everything legally in their power to stop Republicans from doing this, and they had to change longstanding Senate rules to increase your premiums. "They really wanted this and we couldn't do anything about it because we're the minority, now vote for us so we have a chance to stop more damage" seems like a solid midterm argument to me. (4)>>HE IS NOT THE HERO. HE’S THE ABUSER. The current shutdown is not over yet but at the very least it will tie for longest shutdown in history (and it's a full one unlike the previous record holder). Back during Obama's presidency Trump said that ALL shutdowns are the president's fault since it's his job to get people around the table and find a deal to solve the problem or avoid it entirely. The first shutdown was 100% Trump fault since he was the one that vetoed a budget proposal passed by congress but this time it's a more "conventional" case of both parties refusing to move from their positions (Trump did tell republicans to just ignore democrats). And I’ll clarify this a bit. I do not believe that we can blame these two longest shutdowns on it being solely Donald Trump as the variable. Instead, I would argue that the issue is Congress becoming comfortable working under the operating norm that truth is relative to their need. For democrats this is used to state that republicans want families to go hungry. I think that is secondary to republicans having the most stonewall approach to existence ever whether they are the minority or majority. They loathe negotiations. Which sucks, because that’s their job they just prefer to do all the secondary tasks rather than the primary ones. For republicans, it’s culture wars and talking points. Using illegal aliens as a prop and claiming that emergency care, which goes to all Americans because your local hospitals aren’t going to let you bleed out after a car crash waiting for your documents to be confirmed, is also demonstrating a tenuous relationship with the truth. Both parties have desires, and while I am absolutely willing to admit that republicans these last few years have been proportionally more likely to dig in and refuse to cooperate (even amongst each other), that is the “strong willed” trait they have been weeded out for by their constituents. They wanted personality traits of leaders, not leaders themselves. (5)>>People are pissed and they’re tired. Blame to swirl around. President Trump so happens to be a man who can be swayed by his party (arguably the other way around but I feel they both point at each other as their source now) and thus has no problem refusing to leash his Congress into action. While I am fully aware that the difference between these is so small as to almost be pointless, I genuinely believe that even if the President is making demands of Congress, it is Congress’ fault if they choose to have no spine or choose not to negotiate themselves. They answer to their constituents a hell of a lot sooner than the President.
