 |
| A RUNDOWN of the TWITTER FILES . |
(1)>>Elon Musk exposed the fact that pharmaceutical companies used Twitter and other social media companies to promote government lockdowns and to shut down discussion about low-cost covid-19 treatments, even for poor countries. Start with the premise that everyone knows that twitter has been working hand-in-hand with the government to suppress the truth and/or subvert democracy. Then turn off about 1/3rd of your brain cells, and read the files again.We are able to discern this even more clearly with the January 16 batch of Twitter Files, internal e-mails from the social media giant that expose Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Pfizer as engaging in what journalist Lee Fang described as “a massive lobbying blitz to crush any effort to share patents/IP for new covid-related medicine, including therapeutics and vaccines.” (2)>>The same FBI who called Hunter Biden’s laptop “disinformation” is now calling the Twitter Files “disinformation.”Twitter Files 16.0 reveals that powerful drug company lobbyists wrote to Joe Biden’s regime soon after it took power, demanding that the United States government “sanction any country attempting to violate patent rights and create generic, low-cost covid medicine or vaccines.” They didn’t just want to mandate their product on Americans; they wanted to all but mandate it on people around the world. (3)>>Calling these rapidly deployed injections “vaccines” is charitable. In the midst of the epidemic and injection free-for-all, U.S. government health agencies literally changed the definition of “vaccine.” The term previously applied to “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” Now there is a new definition: “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”It’s still a for-profit product. It wouldn’t be bringing billions in profits to pharmaceutical companies if it wasn’t. But now it just needed to “stimulate” your immune system—and who knows to what end. Then it could be called a “vaccine” on social media and everywhere else.More information is coming out about how debilitating and even deadly these “vaccines” have been. Yesterday, (4)>>“thanks Pfizer” was trending on Twitter. Yet Pfizer seems to still have some ability to influence what you see. A few of the posts under that heading had to do with people suffering Pfizer covid injection side effects, but otherwise the trend was a stream of joke posts that Pfizer had caused people to dance badly or caused movie characters to spasm. Project Veritas baited one Pfizer scientist to admitting on hidden camera in 2021 that, “I still feel like I work for an evil corporation, because it comes down to profits in the end. … Basically, our organization is run on covid money now.”
Pfizer SCANDAL .
WAY BACK IN In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. NOW A new video from (4)>>Project Veritas surfaced online and quickly gained traction, garnering over 7 million views on Twitter in the first 10 hours of its upload. The video shows a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, claiming that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” the virus causing COVID-19 through “Directed Evolution.”The reason for wanting to mutate the virus, Walker told an undercover journalist, was so that the company could stay ahead of the game and continue to develop vaccines.“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [coronavirus] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.Walker continued, “from what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [coronavirus mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious — obviously, they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”These are INCREDIBLE statements!! I love how these news people are stating SOO many times, soo passively, how this could ALL Be speculation and made up jargon. When this man on video ("IS") indeed verified, and clearly going into incredible detail about his very real career status. Project Veritas just saved millions of lives. These evil people need to be shut down and prosecuted. The "There There" is that manipulation of coronaviruses in a lab caused the pandemic in the first place, and now it is happening again (allegedly). It doesn't have to be a legal or optics question...it's just morality. These statements are OUTRAGEOUS!! People need to see this.
RELEASE THE KRAKEN !!!
Twitter Files 16.0 is more evidence of the same thing.Most social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter, however, either blocked sharing of the article or at least de prioritise it. (They had been warned by the DoJ beforehand that various bad actors like the Russians might be trying a disinformation campaign and this had those types of fingerprints all over it.) We have no idea what the incentives were for suppressing the story. It seems to me that the most likely explanation is that social media companies were on high alert after being used to spread Russian disinformation in the previous election. This tarnished their reputations and they obviously didn't want to be used in this way again. The Biden administration runs counter-disinformation programs with social media companies focused on COVID misinformation and election misinformation. These programs are legal, even when government employees ask a social media company to review a post for violating community guidelines. It's similar to what the Office of National Drug Control Policy did in the 1990s with promoting anti-drug propaganda in TV shows. The Trump administration ran similar programs that focused on attempts by foreign actors to interfere in US elections. The emails seem to count as evidence against the theory that someone at a federal agency specifically asked (5)>>Twitter to suppress the story or that Twitter suppressed the story to help Democrats. Instead, Twitter executives internally debated what to do about the story.
NOTES AND COMMENTS : (1)>>Elon Musk exposed the fact. In its early days, when Twitter was at its most Twittery, circa 2012, executives called the company “the free-speech wing of the free-speech party”. That was the era when the platform was credited for amplifying the Occupy Wall Street movement and the Arab spring, when it seemed like giving everyone a microphone might actually bring down dictatorships and right the wrongs of neoliberal capitalism. While Musk might be hoping we see documents showing Twitter’s (largely former) staffers nefariously deciding to act in a way that helped now-President Joe Biden, the communications mostly show a team debating how to finalize and communicate a difficult moderation decision. It's clear from the context that Taibbi is implying such takedown requests from both parties were widespread. And certainly the fact that there were takedown requests by TRUMP implies that there were takedown requests other than the Hunter Biden story.(2)>>The same FBI who called Hunter Biden’s laptop “disinformation” is now calling the Twitter Files “disinformation.”The whole Hunter Biden story itself was a bit of a flop, but the context around it is more interesting and concerning. It is disturbing, if unsurprising, that those politically connected (on both sides of the aisle) and the gov have an ongoing relationship with Twitter's moderation team. I think the story is not "Hunter Biden", but "You weren't crazy to talk about active suppression of certain voices by politically connected interests".The biggest controversy of the story comes from Twitter's decision to temporarily suppress it, and the whole reason for that was the suspicious timing of it coupled with the New York Post's initial refusal to cite any of their sources or share anything from the laptop itself, meaning the story literally could not be verified by anyone. (3)>>Calling these rapidly deployed injections “vaccines” is charitable. Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, are a fake charity . They don't work . A recent analysis found that more COVID-19 deaths now occur among the vaccinated, but it also stated that should not be seen as evidence that vaccines don’t work. Experts note that this shift was expected in part because more people than not are vaccinated, at least with their primary shots, and there are other factors, such as waning immunity among the vaccinated, also affecting the numbers. Additionally, unvaccinated individuals could have immunity from COVID-19 itself.Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19. And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission. Blaming the unmasked and “misinformation” Isn’t it obvious vaccines + masks DONT WORK??? In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, individuals with only a cough and positive lab test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion. that vaccine manufacturers have done little to dispel the notion that severe covid-19 was what was being assessed. (4)>>“thanks Pfizer” .Now that Pfizer had admitted that it does gain of function development on Covid to boost profits, should we assume they’ve been doing the same for the seasonal flu?How many billions did they make on flu shots? How many people have died from their engineered flu strains?Big pharma wasn’t worthy of trust prior to two years ago and they’re certainly not worthy of trust now.The pharmaceutical giant posted income of over $100 billion in 2022, the majority coming from Covid products, but it expects to lose out as the pandemic wanes. (4)>>Project Veritas surfaced online and quickly gained traction. Jordon Trishton Walker, identified as director of research and development for strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning at Pfizer, said in the video that the drugmaker is looking at mutating the virus to preempt the development of future vaccines, adding that the company’s ambitions are similar to gain-of-function research.In the video, Walker also discussed the similarities between what Pfizer is alleged to be doing with the COVID-19 virus and what may have occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, leading to a conversation about the so-called “lab leak theory” of the pandemic’s origin in China in late 2019.Additionally, Walker claimed that COVID-19 and its variants have been a “cash cow” for Pfizer and alluded to a cozy relationship between the company and federal health regulators. This Pfizer guy is a certified POS. Notice when he's backed into a corner he claims racism. FU dude.So Pfizer is saying “you guys are crazy, nothing is happening here”…..and that debunks the video? They can’t even confirm or deny he works there? What a sham.(5)>>Twitter to suppress the story or that Twitter suppressed the story to help Democrats. Instead. Yeah, so there does seem to be evidence that a government entity interfered in the 2020 election, but I do find it highly problematic and unethical that Twitter was apparently taking moderation cues from a presidential campaign and the DNC. That simply isn't appropriate. Imagine if Elon took these sorts of cues from his new Republican buddies and actually had his moderation team act upon them? No one would think that's appropriate or ethical. And as we now know, the Hunter Biden laptop story turned out to be completely legitimate. No one knew it at the time, but that's sort of the point - we just didn't know. Twitter censored a story they though might be fake, even though they had no evidence to prove as such either way. And it appears as though they used the hacked materials policy as an excuse, which they knew was pretty dubious. On top of all that, the hacked materials policy was always BS anyway, because by that standard a lot of legitimate journalism should've been banned from Twitter but wasn't.
