MIDTERM ELECTIONS : THE RED WAVE & the "Half".

November 8th is here & and the RED WAVE 
and and the half is Near !

REPUBLICANS GAIN BIG IN 2022 AD ???

Biden is still very unpopular, the economy is not very good, and Rs are winning most of the top issues (1.)>>besides abortion, but that's declining in importance for voters and only at #3 or so.  (1)>>If the expectations are Dems keep the senate because muh November, than those were misinformed expectations in the first place.A hallmark of midterm elections is that those in or leaning toward the party of a sitting president are lethargic, complacent, or at least a little disappointed, and less likely to vote in the general election. True to form, that is the situation Democrats had going into this past summer.Just look at the exceedingly poor shape our country is in.... inflation (40 year high); southern border (300 plus Americans will die today because of fentanyl); historically high crime rates in nearly every large city (14 police officers were shot in just 4 days last week); energy "dependence" (when we were "independent"); Afghanistan; and the list goes on. Is it truly any wonder why Americans want a change, a very big change?Yes I know I’m late by a Anyway here’s my insane ramblings. Generic Ballot/House: The biggest change in my predictions has been the House, a Dem LOSE about 10 seats from last month. Now I have the GB at about R+4, the reason is undecideds breaking Republican as they did in 2020. The polls have it about tied, (538 at D+1, which is laughable, RCP has it even) with Dems at about 47% of the vote. Assuming most vote goes for  GOP and accounting for Indies and 3rd parties that should be R+4-5.Ask about any congressional district you want.  (2)>>Democratic optimism has faded — at least somewhat. Numbers for some Senate candidates who had been polling strikingly well, like  (3)>>John Fetterman in Pennsylvania and Mandela Barnes in Wisconsin, have come back down to Earth. Some blue state governor’s contests now seem unexpectedly competitive. Polls show gas prices and inflation are on many voters’ minds again, and that abortion is fading somewhat as an issue. And more pundits are saying Republicans are gaining an advantage. Fetterman didn’t do so hot in the Dem primary debates, and that was before his stroke. After his stroke it’ll only be worse. Look at some videos of him on the campaign trail. He is not energetic. (3)>> Oz is a TV guy that has sold products before. He knows how to make the case to people. Plus even if Fetterman doesn’t do debates that looks bad on his part. Either way its a loss for Fetterman.Fetterman’s only hope to win is if he wins Trumpers. Oz would lose narrowly. But he can make it up. “But polling tho” most polls have the Dem base beyond Fetterman, Oz winning independents, but not having the full Republican base behind him. Also With Trump doing rallies in the state that’ll help get his supporters behind him. He’s also not as alienating to suburbanites, especially moms, because he’s been a moderate Republican on TV for years.The debates, if there are any, I would argue help Oz. 

KARI LAKE WINS ARIZONA . (Just MAYBE 😋 )

Arizona has voted for Republican presidential candidates in every election since 1952, with two exceptions: Bill Clinton’s 1996 win and Biden’s 2020 win.If Lake wins the governorship, Democrats anticipate that her future endorsements will be sought after, that she will be giving fiery speeches around the country, and that she will have a standing invitation on Fox News.  (4)>>A Lake win is by no means a lock. She’s ahead of Democrat Katie Hobbs by just 1.6 percentage points in the RealClearPolitics average. Still, given the general political environment and how it is tilting further toward the Republicans, she’s clearly in a strong position.Win or lose, there’s no doubt that a major political talent has emerged. Lake is the latest in a line of female champions of a grass-roots conservative populism that runs from Phyllis Schlafly to Sarah Palin to Marjorie Taylor Greene, spanning the 1950s to today.If Lake wins in November, the stakes are clear: Her administration will oversee elections in a swing state that will help decide the next president of the United States. Lake is among those who could end up riding high because of her closeness to Trump, only to find it doesn’t play among a larger electorate. Republicans in Arizona say she will have to reach beyond MAGA diehards and embrace moderates in the state if she is going to win against Democratic nominee Katie Hobbs. 

A RED WAVE ???

In 2016, Trump’s win shocked the world. In 2020, a seeming Democratic romp turned into a nail-biter. And now, as the 2022 midterms are drawing nearer, polls show Democrats performing surprisingly decently — (5)>>pointing toward a close election with a possible  the long-expected GOP wave.Unless, of course, the polls are just underestimating Republicans again. Just because the electorate skews older in midterms doesn't mean that it favors Republicans to the extent that they have a huge advantage. Boomers for instance actually lean Democratic. But there are various factor to the outcomes to mid-term elections. The OP presented one that is STABLE -- meaning regardless of other factors, the GOP has that advantage. The other major factor is what you suggested...the party of the incumbent president often does worse. But as now what happened was mentioned, that affects both parties equally ---- thus it is unstable because it changes due to who is president. So when the President is not on the ballot in the midterm elections, those "presidential election only" voters stay home, and the inflated popularity that President's party enjoyed two years earlier vanishes, especially in swing states where president-only voters are more likely to turn out. The result is a high likelihood of the President's opposition party picking up governorships and seats in Congress. Democratic strategists are now trying to keep voters, donors and volunteers from losing their nerve. Though there is wide agreement that the environment has deteriorated in recent weeks. (6)>> Inflation. Gas prices. Taxes. Cost of living affects us all, and Democrats will be punished for failing to lower that cost across the country. They have failed for years now, and public opinion tells us only one thing: Americans are fed up. The democrats aren't acting like people worried about a election coming up? They act like they know something..repeat of 2020 maybe?Everyone still needs to vote so at least we know we did everything we could do...

 "Half" PART of ......CALIFORNIA.

The 2022 midterm elections are quickly approaching, and Republicans have an uphill battle in their attempt to disrupt the  (7)>>Democrat supermajority in California There’s only two choices across the board for the election (Red And Blue). California is the most free thinking state you would think there would be a third party. CALIFORNIA is perhaps , hopefully gong RED RIGHT ? &n NOPE !!! AS it appears again ,  (8)>>Gov. Gavin Newsom  has his hands in the cookie jar , but everything else in California underneath is RED . Cautionary .😁😅🤣🤣😂😅😁 "California is the most free thinking state" 😁😆😅🤣😂🤣😅😆😁. The most free thinking state?I mean, as long as you tightly follow the regressive mantra of the left, then yes, "free thinking" is a thing.If you truly use your brains, they will call you all the isms and ists.Is it not weird that the "tolerant" faction has no space for alternative ideas?    (8.1)>>Now California and Prop 1 , which would codify Abortion in the California Constitution for me is a NO VOTE . Hopefully a majority of the people of that state will vote NO on this, . There is vary little detail on this CA constitutional amendment on abortion . Troubling part is that California has been pushing abortion right up to birth , instead of pushing for improving the states healthcare system for women . And it is California where Democrats once more turn in hopes of salvaging their hang-by-a-fingernail control of the House, or at least minimizing their losses on  (9)>>Nov. 8. Republicans need to flip just five seats nationwide to take control and usher Speaker Nancy Pelosi into retirement. Analyzing Democrats’ chances of holding the house is far more difficult, with 435 seats spread over fifty states and district lines having been redrawn after the 2020 census. If Democrats can flip Republican-majority Alaska, though, more purplish districts could swing blue, too. The Republicans need only flip five seats nationwide to take control, but Democrats have chances to flip seats, too, including several in California.  When California’s districts were redrawn after the 2020 census, many were shifted into entirely separate regions from the ones they encompassed in the previous decade, and many turned bluer. Overall, given the slender Democratic margins in California , it would be interesting to see the state flip to red .Democrats know they will lose in some of the state’s most targeted races.  (10)>>Californians continue to be punished by Democrat politicians who champion radical policies. Their failed agenda has led to an affordability crisis, ever-increasing gas taxes, surging crime and rampant homelessness. Just recently, we even descended into a recession, while inflation sits at a 40-year high.

The Democrats may just lose 2022 .

The  (11)>>Democrats have to stop acting like the fraidy-cat party and actually do something risky and bold—like introduce universal health, child, and elder care along with free college education for all Americans.The failure of Democratic leaders to recognize the costs of letting the progressive left set the Democratic agenda has been considerable. Given the number of folks who are confronted daily with serious crime, the association of the phrase “defund the police” with the Democratic Party (though Biden himself never said it), has undoubtedly damaged the party’s electoral chances. The Democratic Party of roughly 1928-1988 no longer exists on a national level. What has emerged under the Clintons and Obama is a new party that pays mere lip service to the old.No level or faction of the party is exempted, including the so-called  (12)>>Squad that has caved dismally on every issue. Big corporate influence completely controls the party.Electronic censorship has their full support, as Elon Musk's moves to possibly free up the speech on Twitter are condemned universally in party ranks.Only on the state and local levels in some parts of the country can one sometimes see the old party dynamic in action. On national issues, not at all. The Democrats were once known for their free-wheeling, open debate (though corporate interests never actually lost control except for a brief time in the Roosevelt administration), and the Republicans were known as the party of top-down regimentation. The two parties have now reversed in this respect. A candidate such as Bernie Sanders, who may have actually won the 2016 nominating process if it had been carried out fairly, has NO CHANCE for the nomination. He knows this, and is now limited to small initiatives on the margins. The same situation exists for Tulsi Gabbard, who may be turning Republican, and even for Elizabeth Warren. (13)>>A Democratic Congress DID NOT ENACT ONE ITEM of the Build Back Better agenda (which if the Democrats were smart, would have been named the Green New Deal). Even worse, the Democrats have cut back the limited programs Congress enacted at the beginning of Covid--child tax relief, higher unemployment benefits, supplementary checks that the national treasury can easily afford. This at a time when inflation is devastating workers' incomes.The voting public will consequently see the Democrats, correctly, as cutters rather than expanders of needed benefits. Remember that Obama's number one issue as President was a "grand bargain" to trim Social Security.And they are militarists. Biden's one good action in office, the withdrawal from Afghanistan, has been almost unanimously condemned by the party and its media outlets, often with the wimpy logic, seen in this publication too, that "the withdrawal wasn't carried out in the right way." They are more hawkish on Ukraine than most Republicans and may yet lead us to World War III while avoiding all talk of a negotiated peace.The public is disgusted by the Democrats' failure to do anything for their daily lives and scant pocketbooks, and scared on a primal level by their  (14)>>hawkish policy on Ukraine. This will not end well for the party.

NOTES AND COMMENTS: 

(1.)>>besides abortion, but that's declining in importance for voters .  Abortion seems to be the only thing that the Democrats seem to cling to ,,,,but on a thread .Funding and protection of medicare and social security, workers rights, reducing drug prices, climate change funding, continued funding of Ukraine ??? Abortion is according to some polls the least important thing . With the economy so bad right now the Dem's have a catch 22 situation . But while voters begin casting their ballots in the final stretch leading up to election day, some have begun to question the strategy.Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont in an op-ed published in the Guardian on Monday outlined that although he has a “lifetime 100% pro-choice voting record,” he believes that Democrats may be relying too heavily on the issue, while failing to fend off Republican messaging on the economy.   (1.2)>>If the expectations are Dems keep the senate because muh November. It very much seems to me that they are doing their best to try to discourage people from voting. I am so disgusted by and tired of skewed media coverage that on the surface looks reasonable. If a Republican candidate is behind by five to six points, it's reported that they're polling within the margin. Flip the scenario and have the Democrat behind and that's exactly how they report it. Big deals are made over "expert polls" where fewer than five people per state were included. (I'm looking at you, NYT.) I would hope that we all learn to vary our news sources and look behind the headlines for the truth, because it's never given to us straight anymore. Like so many facets of American life, big business has made profitability the focus of the news media, not actual reporting. (2)>>Democratic optimism has faded. With prices increasing across the board, drivers still pay around $4 per gallon on average for regular unleaded gasoline. Heating oil is even more expensive. From food to household goods, the COVID-19 economy is destroying everyday purchasing power. Yet, thus far, the administration seems unwilling to or incapable of prioritizing the economy at all. Biden officials routinely downplay the inflation crisis, describing it as “temporary” despite many months of evidence to the contrary. Of course, they’re not the only culprits: The mainstream media similarly downplays the inflation problem, devoting disproportionate amounts of time to Ukraine and COVID-19 when they are less concerning to most Americans. As polling expert Nate Silver recently pointed out, news outlets ignore “cost-of-living” stories more often than they should, presumably to cover for the Democrat in office.When even California liberals are complaining about sky-high gas prices, you know that Democrats are in trouble. (Defying logic yet again, however, California Democrats have actually proposed a new tax on gas suppliers, which will inevitably be passed down to consumers.)If you read the tea leaves, 2022 and 2024 will not bode well for Biden, Whitmer and other Democrats. Pocketbook issues always matter most to American voters, and they’ve never mattered more than now, as we exit a pandemic and cope with its long-term economic repercussions. (3)>>John Fetterman. Fetterman continues to insist that he’s gotten a clean bill of health from his physician, the same one he ignored five years ago when told of a serious heart condition that might lead to a stroke. He keeps pointing to a letter from that doctor, a letter that is almost six months old, as proof that he’s fine. But he’s not fine. Even if he’s not entirely of sound body, why should that affect if I vote for him in the general? I chose someone else in the primary because of it, but between him and Oz the choice would be clear regardless of what was wrong with him physically. I was listening to Conan O'Brien's podcast and he had Luke Wilson on and Idiocracy came up and Luke said he thinks Camacho would be a good president because he cares about the people and listens to the smartest man in the world to actually try and fix shit, so we are actually in a worse timeline than Idiocracy. And the media have thrown their full support behind the guy by refusing to insist on those records and instead spinning a narrative that critiques of his health are bigoted, cruel and partisan.  And that was a depressing realization.(3)>> Oz is a TV guy that has sold products before. Oz's campaign is running ads that Fetterman is someone who aligns himself with Bernie Sanders that wants to increase taxes and received money until he was 49. The intention of these ads is to try and convince Moderate Democrats that Fetterman is too extreme.Policy wise most Conservative Democrats will align more with Fetterman than Oz but Fetterman's campaign is being run so poorly that Oz's messaging is eating away at Fetterman's lead. If Oz uses the upcoming debate to paint Fetterman as a socialist we're going to be in for a close election.At the end of the day Pennsylvania is a purple Commonwealth if someone seems to be too far from the middle of the political spectrum it hurts them (Shapiro and Mastriano is a perfect example.(4)>>A Lake win is by no means a lock. She’s ahead of Democrat Katie Hobbs . Keri Lake win could change the outcome of future.  If Lake wins, she instantly has to be at the top of Trump’s potential VP list. Lake is in a neck-and-neck race in Arizona, but she arguably has a better chance than any other famous Trump endorsee this cycle. Her Democratic opponent, the current Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, is a remarkably dull candidate who has refused to debate Lake, calling her a “conspiracy theorist.” If Lake wins in November, the stakes are clear: Her administration will oversee elections in a swing state that will help decide the next president of the United States.(5)>>pointing toward a close election with a possible  the long-expected GOP wave. Republicans’ chances in the House have risen that high because the forecast expects the final margin to be even better for Republicans than the generic-ballot polls currently suggest. The forecast projects that, on average, Republicans will win the national popular vote for the House by 4.0 points.Republicans need to win only a handful of seats to take over the House of Representatives, which Democrats now control by a narrow margin of 220-212. But with two weeks until the election, Republicans are looking to run up the score and win a more expansive — and governable —majority by vying for districts in Democratic bastions, including in Rhode Island, which has not sent a Republican to Congress for nearly three decades.The president’s party almost always does poorly in midterm elections, and early in the year, it looked like that trend would hold true in 2022. (6)>> Inflation. Gas prices. Taxes. Cost of living affects us all.  U.S. President Joe Biden's hopes that his party would head into the midterm elections with inflation receding were dashed when the final report ahead of the November vote showed prices rising more than expected.The report could hurt Biden and his Democrats, who are hoping to retain control of Congress and must convince voters deeply concerned about high prices that they are the ones who can help drive inflation down, even as it occurred under their watch.Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service.  According to a RealClearPolitics polling average, 57.9 per cent of Americans disapprove of Biden’s handling of the economy, while just 38.9 per cent approve, a critical weakness that has left Democrats with a strong chance of losing control of the House of Representatives and possibly the Senate.(7)>>Democrat supermajority in California. What’s most interesting is that Democrats always control the early vote, which is why they have pushed and implemented a month of early voting ahead of Election Day across the country. What is telling is that much of the media is refusing to cover the issues most important to California voters – escalating crime, inflation and the plunging economy, public education, high energy costs – and they aren’t covering the governor’s race between Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom and challenger Republican Sen. Brian Dahle, or even the U.S. Senate race between Democrat Sen. Alex Padilla and challenger Republican Mark Meuser. (8)>>Gov. Gavin Newsom  has his hands in the cookie jar. The Republican party has written California off. Seriously.For example, Newsome was able to run a fake campaign against Elder and Jenner and pretend he was super popular in the recall because the party didn’t support ANY candidate, even reasonably serious ones. They don’t help in downstream races, either. That’s how you get a progressive super-majority in a state with wide swaths that despise progressives. They’ve also changed election laws making it that much harder for anyone other than Democrats to stay on the ballot past the primaries. Once they had the power, they solidified it. Newsom was able to run a fake campaign against Elder and Jenner and pretend he was super popular in the recall because the party didn’t support ANY candidate, even reasonably serious ones. They put all that effort into getting the recall on the ballot, and then when the election came around and they were asked again and again who their recommendation was to replace Gavin . . . crickets. (8.1)>>Now California and Prop 1 , which would codify Abortion in the California Constitution for me is a NO VOTE .  "can the Democrats manage to stop saying abortion long enough to talk about things that people may also care about?" Yeah will probably help this a bit this midterm but they really need to tone it down majorly after the midterms. The independent voters I know care very little about it and democrats can only stay motivated about this so long. Women who view killing off their children as a career and life planning method are already Democrat LVs. The millions of women making up the pro life movement generally vote Republican. Both of these groups combined make up a minority of voters.The majority of voters are far more concerned about being able to provide for themselves and their families as the Biden inflation ravages their income and savings. In the immortal words of Team Clinton - Its the economy, stupid!  (9)>>Nov. 8. Republicans need to flip just five seats nationwide to take control and usher Speaker Nancy Pelosi into retirement.    California’s Republican “party” leadership are lazy and uninterested! Sen Dahle has raised less than $1M – all in small donations – nothing from the elite “grand ol’ party”. Sadly, the debate was typical of leftist media and Brian Dahle ended up debating the moderators as much as debating Newsom, and smarmy Gavin was prepared, as always.Until California gets rid of the “jungle primary” and unless Republican leadership drops the snobby elitist attitude this state is doomed to ruin by leftist Democrat policies. Kevin McCarthy needs to pay more attention to California and less attention to DC politics.As much as I would like to hope that California will return to political sanity I’m afraid that isn’t possible in the foreseeable future. The majority of elected officials in this state are wholly owned toadies of the public employee unions. There is no mechanism to undue that stranglehold and consequently there will be no change. (10)>>Californians continue to be punished by Democrat politicians who champion radical policies.California is also a radical state, radical Senate Democrats scrambled to pass extreme and authoritarian climate legislation to ban fuel Cars   Let’s start with California taxes. Yes, they are high. California taxes are known for being among the highest in the country. Homelessness in California has surged at alarming rates in recent years. At over 150,000 homeless citizens, the “Golden State” has the largest homeless population in the nation. California’s homeless population accounts for 22% of the total U.S homeless population.  Gas prices shot up a jaw-dropping 49.6%, with California snagging the title of the nation’s most expensive market. Nearing 7 dollars in most places . The rising cost of living presents a challenge for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who touted California’s economic prowess. California’s cost of living is well above the national average, and car insurance costs are no exception. On average, Californians pay at least $246 more for car insurance each year than most Americans. I don't think I can reasonably afford a house in a nice area in So Cal.. at least, not without having 2-3 roommates to help pay the mortgage lol.Skyrocketing inflation doesn't help either! Only 4% inflation rate was budgeted for DoD in FY-22, the actual inflation has reached above 9%. That's essentially a 5% cut in buying power. Coupled with food and gas prices increase here in SoCal - 40% to 50% higher than last year. Double whammy! We are screwed! Where can we get more money?  (11)>>Democrats have to stop acting like the fraidy-cat party .The primary issues Democrat candidates seem to be running on are Trump and abortion. Their misguided policies have failed and left a trail of carnage that does not allow them to talk about anything else. Democrat candidates and their sycophants in the media are slowly coming to grips with the possibility of a red tsunami. Assuming that's the case, anticipate the prevailing Dem narrative focusing on Trump/abortion to pivot to a new (old) narrative the U.S is a racist country and the 2022 election results are the result of white racism/white vote fraud/minority voter suppression. The feel good politics of the Biden Administration is not about economic health, which is a key factor in everyone's lives. the public can sense that financially and socially we have gone off the rails with a sense of foreboding for the future.if the Democrats get back into office Nov 7, the market will collapse shortly thereafter. This has been an experiment that failed to deliver what each citizen wants -- safety, security and and an optimistic sense for the future.(12)>>Squad that has caved dismally on every issue. The "squad" is designed to be a distraction from the fact that the the US dems (just as the reps) serve the bourgoise status-quo first, last and always.  so-called "Squad," once a dominant theme for vast numbers of elected Democrats, is backfiring big-time on the party in power, top Democrats tell us.So, another mutation of lame duck liberalism, as you already suspected. AOC doesn't advocate for any systemic change from capitalism, just for reforms that could be easily undone when the GOP inevitably retakes power. And even on this front she is a failure because she votes on the Democrat line more often than not, even when it is against the things she advocates for. At best she is completely ineffective at accomplishing her goals, at worst an opportunist who only cares about her political career.(13)>>A Democratic Congress DID NOT ENACT ONE ITEM of the Build Back Better agenda.Democrats gambled that the public would reward them for moving quickly on the Build Back Better agenda. Many individual items enjoy strong support from the public, including proposals to slash health insurance premiums and extend an ambitious expansion of the child tax credit, which was already being framed as a tax cut for the middle class.  Democrats, coupled with unanimous Republican opposition, gummed up the deal-making process in a way that Joe Biden the candidate said he was uniquely suited to surmount, but in practice as president could not.But their ambitions came to an abrupt skid late last year, when Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) announced he couldn’t support the latest iteration of the bill. Because no Republicans support the bill and because Democrats have a very narrow Senate majority, all 50 members of the caucus need to be on board to pass it via a process known as budget reconciliation. And Democrats are still struggling to piece together a bill that could get this degree of support, given longstanding opposition from holdouts like Manchin. (14)>>hawkish policy on Ukraine.  The Democrats are not the Party of America first . The Proxy war in Ukraine illustrates that Biden and Democrats in Charge can quickly sign 80 billion dollars to fund a war against Russia but not spend a dime to help Americans .lawmakers have agreed to include $12 billion — $4.5 billion for weapons and equipment, and $2.7 for military, intelligence, and other defense support, plus another $4.5 billion to keep the Ukrainian government running for another quarter.Meanwhile, Democrats’ attention seems to be focused elsewhere, on a completely different potential stumbling block: Ukraine !But critics say there has been little visible oversight in Washington of the money already spent, whether it is getting to where it needs to go, or being used effectively by the forces that need it.The word is that the Democrats are unified behind the new aid package (recall no Democrat in either the House or Senate voted against the $40 billion measure in May). Republicans, on the other hand represent the potential opposition, with 11 GOP senators and 57 House Republicans dissenting on that same vote. Pumping more money increases inflation. So does spending massive amounts of money. The aid does have a limit. Which is why Europe needs to help even more. the US is dwarfing everyone in aid. You know another stimulus check isn’t happening.. it’s not even a top issue like student loans and that has not been figured out yet because the Courts stopped it.This was my exact reaction; Ukraine doesn’t belong to the US and we’re not empowered to negotiate their future. Even so reckless spending ! This sub is full of absolutely INSANE warmongering Americans that genuinely believe that American funneling millions of dollars into a proxy war with Russia will yield anything but disaster. The American empire is crumbling around us and instead of our government to invest in the people of this country, they are throwing away the money in endless wars abroad. We're doomed.

THOUGHTS about TULSI GABBARD .

Tulsi Gabbard leaving 
the Democratic Party 
was the best thing 
for her ...

Tulsi Gabbard was ostracized and pushed out of the Democratic party. She doesn't fit into the Republican party either. Tulsi Gabbard leaving the Democratic Party was forthcoming .  Of all the plot twists of the 2020 Democratic Presidential candidates .   (1)>>If there ever was a chance for a woman President I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran who made history in 2012 as the first Hindu elected to the US Congress, has cemented herself as a rising star within the Democratic party. The thing that made me seriously consider voting for her when she ran, was her solidly anti-war stance, one of the strongest out of all the candidates. I decided against it ultimately, but this country has caused too much devastation with its War on Terror. I hope she, regardless of party, continues to exert influence against the endless wars the US engages in. I say : Good for Her!Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) earlier this week announcing why she left the Democratic Party. Except one could reasonably argue that the Democratic Party left Gabbard. “I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party. (2)>> It’s now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoking anti-white racism, who actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms enshrined in our Constitution.”  I don't mean to make excuses for her behavior, but I feel compelled to point out that our government has been supporting various dictators and tyrants around the world for decades now. This is not exclusive to Tulsi Gabbard by any stretch of the imagination. Why do people seem to be unaware of this fact?  (3)>>Gabbard did not indicate whether she would be joining the Republican Party, but she unleashed a litany of condemnations against President Biden and Democrats, focusing largely on the party’s infringement on the freedom of speech and freedom of religion. She has been a democrat her entire career, even running as a Democrat in 2020, but ever since the end of her time in Congress she has made several appearances on Tucker Carlson tonight, has consistently criticized Democratic leadership, from Pelosi to Biden and has called the Jan 6 committee a “show trial”.  Tulsi’s ability to tap into more respectable conspiracy-style thinking about the military industrial complex and distrust of the government - they are all viewpoints/brands/movements/political identities that are successful because they are simple enough to be widely accepted by a specific large enough group (or groups) of people to be politically relevant.Tulsi found a niche and it works. And she’s interesting because, like most of our best national politicians, she comes from a small state where a politician can develop personality and still get elected (4)>>(lookin at you Bernie Sanders).She hasn't been a part of the  Democrat party for a long time...this is just her admitting it has no personal use for her career. BUT she is right that the Democrats have gone over the cliff with a extreme ideology . Yep. Her political career was already dead. She was the Republican party's favorite Democrat, which isn't a particularly useful position to be in. So her career going forward is to be a talking head that Fox News can bring on to further bash the DNC.Finally.This is at least some positive news for once. Maybe someday she'll try another shot for the presidency? Whichever party she'll be affiliated with, if any, is completely outside my realm of knowledge right now though.

NOTES AND COMMENTS :

  (1)>>If there ever was a chance for a woman President I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard. A clue as to why Gabbard is still in the race may be found in a 2019 speech she gave, telling a crowd, "I’m not running for president to be president. I’m running for president to be able to bring about this sea change in our foreign policy that is so necessary for us and for the world, and I’m most qualified to do that.(2)>>It’s now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness. I don't know what she is thinking but to me the "woke" culture is mainly an attempt to divert leftists into bullshit that the "1%" can easily control. For example in America there is no serious talk about free public healthcare, but there can be complete hysteria about what toilets transexuals pee in. A total and complete hypocrisy, and I am sure the same kind of people that are into the "warmonger" thing, would and in fact already are totally abusing the woke thing to their advantage.I mean we are at a point where "leftists" vehemently support fucking multinational companies, because of some le gender wars thing they had in an advertisement.The Democrats had already left Gabbard. The party has not so much drifted to the left since Gabbard entered Congress in 2013 as deliberately set a course, full steam ahead, for big-state autocracy and oligarchy. Gabbard is a religious libertarian. Today’s Democratic Party is run by libertines, not libertarians. Libertinism, whether of the Marquis de Sade or Hunter Biden variety, is one way an aristocracy shows it is above the law. Another is displaying open contempt for the values of the little people who pay their taxes and, as Gabbard did, volunteer to serve in the U.S. Army.(3)>>Gabbard did not indicate whether she would be joining the Republican Party. The reality is that Gabbard, who represented Hawaii’s 2nd Congressional District from 2013 to 2021, had long since drifted to the right on a variety of issues.It's far too easy for people on the Right to embrace those who leave the Democratic Party. Defection isn't easy, given our intense polarization. It is certainly admirable. However, not being a Democrat doesn't make Gabbard, or anyone else, a Republican, conservative, or like-minded when it comes to the most pressing issues. That point is often overlooked when ideological enemies lose one of their own. That Gabbard rejects the progressive mentality fueling leftist culture wars is commendable. But conservatives must remain sober in their evaluation.If Gabbard is actually inclined to go the next step and become a Republican — or a Republican-aligned independent — much depends upon the uses to which she puts her talents. If she were to run for office again in Hawaii, even the possibility of winning elections that are typically closed to the GOP would be worth making some common cause with her.  (4)>>(lookin at you Bernie Sanders).Yeah, would've been nice if she had NEVER endorsed or voted for Biden in the first place. She was the one to have beautifully exposed the corruption of both Kamala & Sleepy Joey B on the debate stage. Tulsi knew just what the Democratic Party was a long time ago; corrupt.I can respect the notion that she ran as a Democrat in the 2020 race because she wanted the be the fresher, newer, reformed voice of a failing political party that just escalates wars & puts the needs of the American people dead last. Unfortunately, the DNC and the corrupt political establishment decided to put an unpopular senile in charge.

UKRAINE INSANE !

Mad and desperate Zelensky called for 
 NATO preemptive strikes inside Russia .
Insane our government has given billions to this madman.
Ukraine gone Insane !

UKRAINE IS INSANE ! thanks to the  (1)>>Puppet Zelensky , who has called for preemptive NATO strikes on Russian soil . In a speech on Oct. 6, President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that NATO’s goal was to make it impossible for Russia to use nuclear weapons. He made a broad appeal, stating: “I once again appeal to the international community, as it was before February 24: preemptive strikes so that they [Russians] know what will happen to them and not vice versa.”  (2)>>SO AS I have said about Zelensky before , YOU CAN'T Trust this guy , he is NUTS and he's leading Europe and NATO into a Nuclear war with Russia . Now AS CONTROVERSIAL , as to what he said , the Lefties all over are trying to backtrack on his speech saying that it was a misinterpretation of exactly WHAT HE SAID .It is pretty obvious he meant military strikes. The fact that a Ukrainian government spokesperson had to clarify that he ''didn't mean nuclear strikes'' would indicate that he meant military strikes of some description. How the hell are you getting sanctions from this? And how the hell is this the top comment? So Zelensky DOES speak of strikes. And I’ll be frank here : I am not a fan of unadulterated worship.  (3)>>Of Zelensky or anyone for that matter. Read about any “great man”. And you eventually always find the same old things you find with everyone else : pride, bias, insecurity and sometimes sheer incompetence. There are only human beings down there. Just because someone did something great or is exceedingly good at something doesn’t mean he doesn’t plain suck sometimes. But I don’t like everything he says. Bitching about the planes, the no fly zone, NATO,. Give me this and give me that and how can you refuse me that ? Sometimes it’s like he doesn’t fully realize the risks and meaning of what he asks. And an overall underlying direction I find in his communication is he really seems to want the West to go balls to the wall and practically engage in full war with Russia without any real strategy… besides “balls to the wall”.And here preemptive strikes ? Seriously what possible good could come out of it ?? Putin can’t afford to be beat by Ukraine. That’s why he delayed the mobilization right up the last possible moment. In all his communication lately you clearly see he reframed everything as a war against the West.  (4)>>I strongly doubt Preemptive strikes would neutralize all Russian capacities when Russia has been training specifically against a US attack for decades . If it was THAT fucking easy the Soviet Union and later Russia would have been carpet bombed way before when they acted out . So what ? Zelensky thinks Putin will suddenly be terrified by those strikes ?That Putin immediately surrender when this sociopath keeps doubling down again and again, even “suiciding” about 15 oligarch since the conflict started ? The West will not neutralize every single offensive capacity of Russia and Putin won’t surrender just because we striked.

BIDEN'S ARMAGEDDON ?

Instead of talking Peace & ending the 
war , Biden is taking us to
doomsday .

I wonder if the  (5)>>US stock market is going to tank. With Biden's Armageddon ? Every single country is equally as evil as the next. They've all committed unspeakable acts. Of course we're scared, same as you and your family. We're all the same behind the screens.The president’s grim assessment ,  (6)>>YES his fault for the proxy war against Russia rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S. intelligence assessments..Besides (7)>>INSANE ZELENSKY we have to deal with a frail senile U.S. President Biden who has gone nuclear as well . The US president issued his warning at a private fundraising event in New York on Thursday evening, in his most outspoken remarks yet on the threat of wartime nuclear weapons being used for the first time since 1945. So what the HELL is he telling us .  (8)>>Did we HEED ELON MUSK TO END THE WAR????    (9)>>Between Zelensky and Biden is SOMETHING COMING ??? Doesn't help  fears that the US just purchased $290 million worth of radiation sickness drugs  in weeks prior to Biden coming out with this statement . Putin's approach is escalate to de escalate, he'll nuke a whole city in  (9.1)>> Ukraine just to try and force a surrender of Ukraine, and from there it'll only get worse. We should've never put our hands in the cookie jar, now the US and the rest of europe is in deep shit. Thanks to the  BIDEN ADMINISTRATION for this screw up . I don't know if we have a month or a matter of weeks till we get radiated ? But we have fucking insane leaders in Washington D.C. right now , it's not much PUTIN own doings to worry about . This is an attempt to stop it from happening. By saying that Armageddon might happen, the implication is that the US could consider a response in case of a nuclear strike on theirs Allies (Armageddon only happens if nukes are fired back/other parts of the world are involved). By even raising an implication of a US response, what Biden is trying to stay Putin’s hand, as he probably wouldn’t launch a nuke if he had a shadow of a doubt the US might literally wipe his country off the map and trigger an apocalypse. The people not worried are the ignorant of the true scale of the of the threat people. anyone downplaying the use of nukes has no business reassuring anyone about how "tactical" or "small yield" they will be. they don't know, no one who is not in putlers circle know. keep that in mind and pray for the people of Ukraine,  (10)>>YES KICK ZELENSKY OUT !!! & they are the ones in most imminent danger.There are not enough narcotics in the world to shut it off. The thing is we can do nothing different. In the face of war and occupation Threats of nukes means nothing. You just can't cave.

NORD STREAM PIPELINE BLOW UP . The Crimea Bridge ???

(11)>>Blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline ... is a "pipe dream" of the U.S. to sabotage Russian natural gas to Europe .Biden in February: "If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." Reporter: "But how will you do that, exactly, since...the project is in Germany's control?" Biden: "I promise you, we will be able to do that." Right it makes sense ??? If the CIA is saying Russia blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, then there is a 99.9% chance it was the Biden administration or Zelensky .Why would Russia blow it up when the could just shut it down?How much do you think Burisma paid Biden to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline?Why is it the Biden administration is hysterical about EVERY environmental catastrophe EXCEPT the Nord Stream 2 disaster? World leaders, technical experts and engineers are nearly unanimous that the pipelines were attacked by a planned powerful underwater explosion of a highly complex nature.Such industrial sabotage will impact millions of people, raise prices and seriously undermine Germany and other EU countries’ industrial capacity. NEXT 👉👉👉 (12)>>NOW the Kerch bridge. WHO BLEW IT UP?? Russia's Federal Security Service arrested eight men alleged to have taken part in an elaborate scheme to destroy the Crimean bridge. Investigators said Ukrainians, Russians and an Armenian camouflaged tons of explosives and shipped them to several countries before the attack. Russia says a driver with no previous connections to terrorism drove a truck bomb onto the bridge at a time to maximize damage. So far the war is now descendinging into terrorism .

FINAL WORD : TIME FOR PEACE OR ELSE !!!!

(12)>>People in America and Europe are just starting to wake up to the mess our government(s) officials had created . Right now we have massive protests in Europe against the sanctions on Russia .  (13)>>Hoping to see any anti war protests in America with the likes of the BLM -Floyd riots of 2020 should be forthcoming . I mean knowing that your elected leaders are funding a proxy war against Russia that might end up nuclear is the worst thing fostered on the American people and the world . Example , recently  Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was heckled anti war activists who accused her during a town hall event of “voting to start a nuclear war.” “Congresswoman! None of this matters unless there’s a nuclear war, which you voted to send arms and weapons to Ukraine,” one protester shouted, according to a video posted on Twitter. The heckler began yelling at Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) during the Q&A portion of the event, criticizing the Democrat’s support for sending military aid to Ukraine as it attempts to ward off a Russian invasion. “Tulsi Gabbard, she’s left the Democratic Party because they’re a bunch of war hawks,” the heckler continued. “You ran as an outsider, yet you’ve been voting to start this war in Ukraine. You’re voting to start a third nuclear war with Russia and China. Why are you playing with the lives of American citizens?”For myself I do not want the US to be over there and helping in anyway[ USING UKRAINE TO FIGHT RUSSIA ]  because I'm sick and tired of foreign interests constantly guiding our country right and left over the decades and the only thing that seems to come from it are the Dems milking tons of money by passing a ton of shit because no one is paying attention to anything they are doing because "we're in conflict!"For all their shortcomings, Kennedy and  Khrushchev were reasonable enough to take a step back and avoid a nuclear war. I am far from being confident that the current leaders on both sides can do the same.

NOTES AND COMMENTS: 

(1)>>Puppet Zelensky , who has called for preemptive NATO strikes on Russian soil .  In the beginning, I asked, why it is happening and who is Mr. Zelensky. The next part is only my personal opinion that is based on facts, events that happened during the last 10 years. So, as for me, no one is responsible. It’s funny, isn’t it? I’m sure you didn’t expect me to say this. But it’s true, and that’s why. Therefore, I can state with complete confidence that Mr. Zelensky is a f*cking puppet in the US hands. He has no authority here! He’s just a comic and nothing more. A comic, that was good for the US.  Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday called for the international community to take "Preventive action" to deter the potential use of nuclear weapons by Russia in the ongoing war in Ukraine.In an address to the Lowy Institute, a nonpartisan international policy think tank in Australia, Zelensky underscored the importance of "Preventive strikes, preventive action" so that Russia can get a better picture of the potential consequences if they move to use nuclear weapons.In his address Thursday, Zelensky repeated his concerns about Russian military presence at Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest in Europe.    (2)>>SO AS I have said about Zelensky before , YOU CAN'T Trust this guy . The only way to really blackmail someone or the entire world as this guy is saying with nuclear destruction is to actually use nuclear weapons, being the first country to do so since WW2, that will result in the immediate surrender of Ukraine. But I guess the defense industry needs to spend all the old missiles so they can profit off of newly built missiles and arty. Also getting rid of old stock of weapons so new ones can be ordered is what nations all across the world are doing. There is actually so much money to be made here its unbelievable the fat stacks of cash some people will have.Using a nuclear bomb is not only unethical but dangerous and threatens the safety of the globe. Someone like Vladimir Putin clearly doesn’t have respect for human lives and scoffs at the idea of deescalation. That being said, if he drops one we all gunna drop em right guys! Cats outta the bag! One nuke which is devastating means we just all gunna end the globe right yalllllll woooooooooooo mutually assured destruction!!! Oh and don’t worry guys me and all my friends will be running to a fortified nuclear bunker with provisions to outlast the fallout, we’re politicians, when we say mutually assured destruction only applies to the people we swore to protect! Yeahhhhh!!!! (3)>>Of Zelensky or anyone for that matter. Read about any “great man”. .......Zalensky the puppet was installed by US and NATO operatives when he was elected . AS far as being a Comedian , he's taken Ukraine into a dark path . If NATO went along with it, a war would start like none we've ever seen: Endless troops, streams of tanks, a sky blotted out by warplanes.It's far more likely that there would be little left of humanity after war was joined between the United States/NATO and Russia. And would China pick a side? Or simply see an opportunity?And there is funny business going on in Kyiv. On July 17, Zelensky fired his country’s prosecutor general and the leader of its domestic intelligence agency — the most significant shake-up in his government since the Russian invasion in February. It would be the equivalent of Biden firing Merrick Garland and Bill Burns on the same day. But I have still not seen any reporting that convincingly explains what that was all about. It is as if we don’t want to look too closely under the hood in Kyiv for fear of what corruption or antics we might see, when we have invested so much there. (4)>>I strongly doubt Preemptive strikes would neutralize all Russian capacities when Russia has been training specifically against a US attack for decades .  What do you think a preemptive strike to warn someone against the use of nuclear weapons looks like and what do you think he means when he said NATO need to rethink the order of pressure in a nuclear conflict. It's clear what he meant  Zelensky, in his speech on Oct. 6   He appealed to the international community ,to do preemptive strikes, so they know what will happen to them if they use it, and not vice versa - to wait for nuclear strikes by Russia. What an insane take.  Any preemptive nuclear strike is just dumb.  May I remind you that there are little children in Russia too. Zelensky calling for a first strike is one of the craziest things a modern politician has ever advocated for.   (5)>>US stock market is going to tank.  This Proxy War is going to shake up the U.S. Stock market in a few months .  Trump predicted everything what we are experiencing right now: inflation, market crash, wasteful government spending, etc. In terms of strengths of Trump, it was economy. At the time of his administration country we had positive GDP. He did not start wars. We did not have skyrocketing inflation. Current administration has no strengths only failures in every single aspect.  Unsurprisingly, inflation remains the tail that wags the dog in markets. Russia's war in Ukraine has fueled further economic uncertainty. For example, the turmoil has caused a supply shock that has helped drive up oil and other commodity prices, while also triggering particular concerns about Europe's economy.The war is a big factor to the market downdraw. The sanctions, even bigger.But the elephant in the room is a tightening monetary policy, quantitative tightening, and an aggressive Fed.We'll see a bounce, but I don't expect all time highs and in fact am preparing for more downside in 2022 even if the war ends. (6)>>YES his fault for the proxy war against Russia .  The Biden Administration and its NATO partners have decided, from a comfortable distance away from the fight, that millions of Ukrainian lives are a price worth paying to make sure the band stays together, with the side benefit of chipping away at Russia’s military.  So, straight up - let's get to the meat of this post. Are they loans or not? Does the USA lose the money if Ukraine loses the war? 30 years of expansion east to Russia's borders. This war has been provoked over 30 years and especially since 2014. If you don't see that, you have no idea what's been going on.I don;t think you understand the chain of events that led us here.The war is horrible and a tragedy in the 21st century to see trench warfare in Europe.Why do you think Putin invaded? Most people don;t really have any sort of answer to that that makes any sense. Russia's reasons make perfect sense (from their perspective) though if you're willing to listen to them. (7)>>INSANE ZELENSKY.  Zelensky increasingly reveals his true nature.  If Putin is a madman , then Zelensky tops insanity ,But now, the reality of his rule in Ukraine is becoming undeniable.COMEDIAN ZELENSKY IS BOASTING TOO MUCH....HAVING WEST AS BACK UP He even threatened World War 3 if his demands were not met . Yes, Zelensky is not afraid to hide his motives in regards to the war . Zelensky said on  it was “hard to say” whether the risk of nuclear war had increased with his military’s territorial gains, but he remains confident his Russian counterpart would not survive such an escalation in hostilities. As it is, weapons will wash around the region for decades, being used in all kinds of conflicts including criminal; and Ukraine will lose. Inevitably. The West is now prosecuting a proxy war without regard for civilian deaths. Funny NO PEACE talks to end the war ...(8)>>Did we HEED ELON MUSK TO END THE WAR????.Elon Musk is branded insane for suggesting peace talks?  The Tesla titan took to Twitter and proposed a string of ideas to solve the eight-month conflict, asking his followers to vote “yes” or “no” on his proposals, which included formally allowing Russia to annex Crimea.And the stunt went down badly with the country’s leader who took to Twitter with a poll of his own.Mr Zelensky, who has become a social media star in his own right in the course of the war, asked his 6.6m Twitter followers to choose which Elon Musk they “liked more.”   that Elon is a Putin sympathizer to even suggest peace. I will tell you what's insane, Zelensky recently made LAW that Ukraine will never seek peace talks, Now That's insane. Given that Zelensky has arrested all political opposition, shut down opposition press and arrested their owners and reporters, has a kill list for anyone critical of his government that extends to US politicians, actors, media personalities and even children I highly doubt that he has any intention of bringing anything like freedom of expression or freedom in general to Ukraine.(9)>>Between Zelensky and Biden is SOMETHING COMING ??? I’m gonna say this, there are nuclear power plants in the United States and they’re only stockpiling this drug they’re not distributing it to anybody it’s quite likely that it’s in case of a nuclear meltdown, and one of the power plants in the United States. We don’t know we can only really speculate what It could be.  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced on Tuesday the significant procurement of ☢️ sickness 💊s.The HHS press release revealed the purchase was part of “ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies.”The announcement comes after warnings of “the prospect of Armageddon” being instigated by Russian president Vladimir Putin, [reported NY P🙀st].The drug is sold under the brand name Nplate manufactured by California-based Amgen. It encourages the production of platelets and is used to minimize bleeding caused by acute radiation syndrome (ARS). The capsules can be used by 👨‍👩‍👧.So how much diplomacy could $290 million buy? Let alone the dozens of billions being pumped into feed a needless war with a nuclear armed country?  (9.1)>> Ukraine just to try and force a surrender of Ukraine, and from there it'll only get worse. At the end of the Soviet Union the then leader Gorbachov made a gentleman agreement with the USA, EU and NATO agreeing that NATO would never expand towards the East - to Russia...(who violated that agreement?). So.. what is the history of this dispute? We must go back to the fall of the Soviet Union after which the Ukraine became an independent Country. The people of the Ukraine organized democratic held elections in which Viktor Yanukovych became President. These elections were observed by EU representatives and they concluded no wrong doings. The voters voting for Yanukovych wished for their Country to stay neutral and to do trade with both the EU and Russia. But the WEF Globalist controlled EU told Yanukovych to only trade with them and he also had to make the Ukraine a member of NATO, or their would be no deal at all. Yanukovych refused. Biden, the CIA and the EU then did everything to remove Yanukovych from power - in which they succeeded in the year 2014 - to replace him by a corrupt Ukraine Oligarch by the name of Poroshenko. As soon as Poroshenko was installed is when he asked Obama ruled America and the EU / NATO for "protection" against Russia, and so the US and the EU promised to protect Poroshenko. Now feeling secure Poroshenko started to discriminate the Russian speaking Ukrainians (!) living in the east of Ukraine because they didn't want to become part of the EU or NATO as they were promised to stay neutral. So the Russian speaking Ukrainian citizens in Ukraine got randomly bombarded by the Poroshenko regime and his successor Zelensky for 8 years straight to which they finally called Putin for help. See how this works? Putin doesn't want Ukraine to become a NATO member. What would the USA do if Putin was to place troops and rockets along the south or northern US border.. would the USA say : "O please, go ahead " ? The truth is: WEF / EU Globalists want Putin be removed and replaced by some Russian corrupt traitor doing the wishes of the WEF Globalists. Make no mistake (and we see it clearly now in Canada) - the WEF Globalists want to rule the whole world; Communist style with Chinese style "social credit score". The Ukraine people should have decided to stay a neutral Country... works VERY well for Switzerland. If Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine would have formed a neutral zone situated between de EU / NATO and Russia there would never be war again. They should together be able to trade with the EU and with Russia too, and they should be allowed to have their own form of defense (industry). But this is made impossible because of evil people who love to hate, kill and destroy, and because of their love for power over others and their love for money, rather than to live in peace with each other. God said through Jesus to love our neighbor as we love ourselves – meaning everyone.   (10)>>YES KICK ZELENSKY OUT !!! Zelensky is hell bent on more war , its more than defending the so called liberty of  Ukraine  from the big bad Russians ,   its more about doomsday. A long - horrible war with loads more deaths at the very least. For certain other Putanesca-esque regimes would be galvanized against the west and their world police force. More despots might feel entitled to take similar aggressive tactics during a time when the west is otherwise engaged. More fighting, more death.This end game would certainly be different than the current end game. Zelensky proves why Ukraine should not be allowed into NATO any time soon. Support them by all means but let’s not run away with the fact that Ukraine was a stable state before Russia invaded. You’re not gambling with the the lives of my grandchildren on this war.  Remember this guy Zalinsky is a actor first and foremost .hes playing a part in this show just get ya head down and go for peace 🇬🇧️Let's say NATO did a preemptive strike, what is the end game? Perhaps then he can drive towards Moscow? Absolutely insane.(11)>>Blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline ...  This is the BIG WHO DONE IT ? We all should guess Ukrainian agents via NATO via the U.S. What am I missing?Sabotaging one pipeline for the purpose of turning another back on seems like a lot of work for a neutral outcome.We are talking about 3 out 4 pipelines. There are 4 baltic pipelines, 3 of them simultaneously failed shortly after seismic monitors detected a series of explosions. Come now , why would Russia do it ? when the U.S. wants the EU to stop using Russian gas .Construction of NS pipelines was the biggest geopolitical failure for Poland and the Baltic States in this century, it was also a huge blow to Ukraine. It was the base for future Russian German cooperation that excluded the rest of Central European countries, throwing them to the wolfs basically. Whoever blew this pipe up, we are very grateful for that.US does benefit from the pipeline shutting down. But it would be catastrophically insane to sabotage the pipelines. Explosives leave traces. (12)>>NOW the Kerch bridge. WHO BLEW IT UP??  Give or take a few NATO supplied the weapons to Ukraine to blow up the bridge .To me it looks as though the truck is ahead of the explosion. Really looks like there were pre placed explosives under the bridge and the fact that there was a truck driving over that area is a coincidence.Thinking that its a fair bit less embarrassing than Ukrainian commandos swimming around in Crimea rising a question if the russian trained dolphins were drunk or what they were doing. Just to put this in perspective on how big of a deal this is, the Russians paid upwards of 3.7 BILLION DOLLARS to build that bridge from 2014 to 2016 after they invaded Crimea and the Ukrainians are now able to destroy it from distance. There are 3 parts of the bridge, 2 roadways and the railway part of the bridge which now has a full fuel train burning on the tracks and it looks as if at least one of the roadways is now collapsed as well.This is such a monumental strategic victory that any attempt by Russia to hit back in kind is a very scary prospect, because I can't see how they do so strategically against a logistical target, they can surely only do so by attacking civilians.(12)>>People in America and Europe are just starting to wake up .  It's TIME for anti- war protests against any prolonged war in Ukraine . joe biden pledges to support Ukraine for “as long as it takes”. His administration has spent about $80bn on military aid alone. The price tag of this crazy war keeps going up & Zelensky keeps making demands on the U.S. Congress . But nearly six months into the fight, with the prospect of a long war to come, even Mr Biden’s closest allies are asking whether America might soon tire of the burden. The president is more unpopular. People [ American] have to wake up sooner or later . In Europe now protests are showing up in Germany , most of the EU . The only side who has talked about peace are the Russian's, not one leader from the West has mentioned de-escalation only war, every chance for peace for the last 8 years has been destroyed by the West and in particular the US, Germany/France are spineless. Should tell everyone what their leader thinks of how little their life is valued by them, and expendable resource is how they see you.(13)>>Hoping to see any anti war protests in America . First off AMERICANS have to stop rallying in support for Ukraine and START protesting in order to force the U.S. government to end the war , begin to negotiate with Russia . AT LEAST IN RUSSIA there were ANTI-WAR protests , but here in the brainwashed land of the free , there are none? WHY , even with the threat of nuclear war , the American people have been taken in , the population has become numb . In Russia people took to the streets . Here again nothing ? Now that silence you heard when all of the cannon fodder was coming ? All NATO countries with red in their flags started to make anti-war flags for support the anti-war protests against Russia since so many people started to realize how much the Russo-Ukrainian war was more like a Russo-NATO war and both sides were doing war crimes . Make no mistake if there’s a nuclear war and if America is pulled in, all the non-NATO allies. will be pulled in too. Please discourage warmongering rhetoric wherever you see it. The world owes Ukraine nothing in terms of protection of their territorial integrity.