 |
| Was it a trap? Maybe it was . |
VERY bizarre. Should be the word to describe the Sharon Osbourne incident . I am going to go give my opinions after watching first what (1)>>Piers Morgan said , what Sharon said . I am going to shock you . You may not like what am going to say here . The Truth here first that the accusation that Morgan was racist in disputing 👇
(2)>> the" claims" of Meghan Markle . PERSONALLY I don't care about the royals after what happened to Diana. Second the fact that (3)>>Harry and Meghan live in LA bought a huge mansion still with royal security like a head of state its mind boggling that they are here playing the "fugitives" , but still living a lavish life . ANYWAY I watched his show Good Morning Britain . Morgan was only defending the Royals from scandalous accusations, it was never about Race from the start of it . But retroactively going back to Meghan Markle with Oprah. The Oprah interview is a also a bit curious as it began ....“I wasn’t planning on saying anything shocking,” Meghan told Oprah as they sat on the bucolic patio of a Santa Barbara-area estate. “I’m just telling you what happened.” Many of us should know apart from Harry and Meghan the royal family has had problems starting with Charles and Diana. The so called ex- royals now reside in America with a mansion in L.A. to repeat. The Prince, Princess even fled Canada for some reason that they have to live in the good ole (4)>>U.S.A hit already cancel culture, race bating , racism culture they had to pick a interview with Oprah a perfect dirt digger for the race card in America .By now, anyone captivated or even glancingly interested in the saga of how Prince Harry and his American-born actress wife came to be living in Southern California will be familiar with the many bombshells that were dropped over the course of the two-hour interview, broadcast Sunday evening. There is always a curious thing about how the interview was done in that respect . (5)>>Now going back to Osbourne I think she was taken off guard , she was in the middle of a conversation that looked like she was race baited by two other women over her opinions regarding another man's view to exercise his rights to his opinions . They were goading Osbourne where she lost her temper . Yes, folks it looks like it was staged, a good trap. Do any of you understand this? The argument between Osbourne and her colleagues resulted in the show's hiatus. During a sit-down interview with Entertainment Tonight, Osbourne stated that she was the only co-host who wasn't previously made aware of the topics for conversation prior to filming."Sheryl [Underwood] turns around and asks me this question and ... she was reading it off a card. It wasn't on my cards," Osbourne told ET . "And then Elaine [Welteroth]'s reading her questions and I'm like, 'I've been set up.' They're setting me up. My anger was like, I cannot believe this, I'm your sacrificial lamb," she continued. Osbourne explained that the co-hosts had made a pact in February that they wouldn't ask questions created by producers without first giving each other a head's up. The agreement was made following an incident during which host Carrie Ann Inaba asked Welteroth a question regarding racial issues that Osbourne claimed Inaba didn't want to ask. ALL THIS says that Osbourne was set up . Was it done on purpose ? CBS might investigate?
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
(1)>>Piers Morgan said. 👉👉In a tweet as his program was beginning, Morgan said: "On Monday, I said I didn't believe Meghan Markle in her Oprah interview. I've had time to reflect on this opinion, and I still don't." He added: "Freedom of speech is a hill I'm happy to die on. Thanks for all the love, and hate. I'm off to spend more time with my opinions." His message was accompanied by a photo of Winston Churchill with a quote about free speech.He explained: "I believe in freedom of speech, I believe in the right to be allowed to have an opinion. If people want to believe Meghan Markle, that's entirely their right."I don't believe almost anything that comes out of her mouth and I think the damage she's done to the British monarchy and to the Queen at a time when Prince Philip is lying in hospital is enormous and frankly contemptible."If I have to fall on my sword for expressing an honestly held opinion about Meghan Markle and that diatribe of bilge that she came out with in that interview, so be it."Before his departure on Tuesday, Morgan did concede that it was "not for me to question if she felt suicidal".(2)>> the" claims" of Meghan Markle . I think Meghan was wrong by yet going to the American media and giving them what they needed like a thirsty girl, but claims of racism against the English royals is troubling . While disputing things here with caution using the hyper American media already fueled by the race card is part of the argument by Morgan . Now her claims could be true , but she could have used the British media first . It's ironic that they put more importance in investigating supposed bullying claims made against Meghan by staff (who have incentive to smear her name )It is important to British people that their Royals are apolitical. Charity work is encouraged but activism is not. The difference is a thin line, and my understanding is that many Brits reacted poorly to how Meghan toed it. Battle of Brothers by Robert Lacey. It is about the rift between William and Harry that occurred after Harry got engaged to Meghan. I believe Robert Lacey was a consultant on The Crown as well. In his book, Lacey outlined a lot of the ways that Meghan specifically wanted to be more political than Royals traditionally are. One example was that whwn she guest edited an issue of British Vogue, she decorated the cover with photos of activists that she admired. She also remarked about how she wanted to do charity work to support activist groups like #TimesUp and #MeToo right after she was married. Meghan is vary different from Diana . She was already lavished and spoiled like a movie star way before she met Harry . She was previously married , divorced . Besides holding Harry's hand in serious events , traveling in private jets (like other royals), spending money on clothes (like other royals) and being estranged from her family (as if the royal family were super nice to one another). The only really wrong thing that I found was that she announced her pregnancy at someone else's wedding which is totally not cool BUT it is really nothing compared to the things other family members have done. NOW the opinion because of what the media writes about her, but I wouldn’t say she’s the most hated member or that she’s hated by the UK. Most people are probably just upset because they stepped down as senior royals to have more privacy but then they move to LA and get a netflix deal which seems kinda hypocritical? It just seems like they didn’t want to do their roles but still want the perks from it. It was also kinda shady that they made the announcement to step down the day before Kate’s birthday. Their timing with announcements are not that great and seems selfish.(3)>>Harry and Meghan live in LA bought a huge mansion. Since then, the couple and their one-year-old son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor have taken up home in an array of places (first a secluded home in the Canadian countryside, and then an $18 million LA mansion loaned to them by Hollywood tycoon Tyler Perry) before purchasing a Santa Barbara mansion in last summer.The couple landed on a $14.65 million (or £11 million) property in Montecito, in the Santa Barbara area of California. The Duke and Duchess are reported to have moved into their Santa Barbara mansion lastJuly, during the coronavirus pandemic, and have spent the months since making the vast estate their home. 👉👉https://www.realtor.com/news/celebrity-real-estate/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-buy-their-first-home-in-santa-barbara/ 👈👈 (4)>>U.S.A hit already cancel culture. The Osbourne incident reeks of "intimidation" for example as part of the cancel culture. It was public shaming , nothing else . So much has been written about cancel culture in the past year that weariness sets in just reading the words. What it is, what to call it and whether it even exists are all in dispute. The term is shambolically applied to incidents both online and off that range from vigilante justice to hostile debate to stalking, intimidation and harassment. The American nation is being turned upside down by a bunch of yuppies that want to do some why to erase anything that has to do with "racism" in the nations past . Now it's gone full speed attacking people for their own views , putting the label of "racism" on cultural objects . According to the news site Vox, the first reference of canceling a person in pop culture possibly comes from the 1991 movie New Jack City, when Wesley Snipes’ character, Nino Brown, says, “Cancel that [woman]. I’ll buy another one,” referencing his girlfriend’s disapproval of his violent ways. In 2010, rapper Lil Wayne referenced the quote in his song “I’m Single.” But it was after a 2014 Love & Hip-Hop: New York episode when cast member Cisco Rosado told his love interest “You’re canceled,” that the term gained traction on social media. Soon after, Black Twitter began using it both jokingly and seriously to express their disagreement with others.(5)>>Now going back to Osbourne I think she was taken off guard . Claiming that she was caught off-guard by the direction Underwood went in, Osbourne saw the moment as one that was pre-arranged to put her in the hot seat. "I've been set up. And I went, like, how dare you all do this to me? I'm your sacrificial lamb," she said during her ET interview. But Osbourne apparently has some regret over how she reacted to Underwood- specifically, her comments to her co-host when Underwood began to cry. "I got too personal with Sheryl. I should never have said [anything] about her tears. I should never have dismissed her feelings on national TV. Ever. But I said it, I have to own it," she explained (with Osbourne claiming she apologized to Underwood but hadn't heard back).
