THE BIG BALLOON OF A STORY !

I'm just a little spy satellite, hovering over the honey tree. I'm just a little spy satellite, pay no attention to mee.  (1)>>Why would they send a balloon to spy on the US? It is unreliable, hard to position precisely, extremely easy to detect and in the end doesn't give you much better info than the advanced spy satellites are already providing. And if it is shot down/crashes, the enemy gets access to your spy gear. Satellites at least burn on reentry.So we are giving them exactly what they wanted then?Also, why would they think that a useless balloon would get a reaction?  (2)>>The Pentagon said that similar incidents happened in the past and there were zero news stories about them, since worrying about minor things like rogue balloons is really stupid. Why would they think that the reaction would be different this time? The BIG SPOOF of this balloon story comes at the heels of the  (3)>>American Military Industrial complex gearing up for war with China in 2025 . A four-star Air Force general sent a memo on Friday to the officers he commands that predicts the U.S. will be at war with China in two years and tells them to get ready to prep by firing "a clip" at a target, and "aim for the head." In the memo sent Friday and obtained by NBC News, Gen. Mike Minihan, head of Air Mobility Command, said, “I hope I am wrong. My gut tells me will fight in 2025.” Now its KINDA Coincidental that a so called Chinese Spy Balloon somehow slipped through  (4)>>NORAD National Air defense with out a hiss . This is pretty BIG just think if was a Missile of sorts ???? Everyone’s watching Europe. Don’t forget this is a big threat as well. Lots of people say WW3 won’t happen if a NATO/Russia conflict kicks off. If this kicks off at the same time… while Russia and China may not directly cooperate, I would consider multiple major wars around the globe to be a geographic world war. Thats how global wars start, it's just a series of countries initiating their gripes through conflicts. We could see the Ukraine war as the beginning, then suddenly China attacks Taiwan and the US get involved, maybe Israel surprise attacks Iran and middle east countries may get involved, kosovo-serbia maybe, maybe some African countries reignite old wounds etc.You can see within a few years we're basically in a defacto global conflict which will affect global trade.Once the wars move to a nuclear exchange, it's game over for large swathes of the planet. 😐None of the people that are the most outraged about this balloon have any clue about how how surveillance type information is gathered by any world nation.There are freely available, regularly updated satellite imagery literally eveywhere. The most visible of these being google earth/maps. But to be honest commercial satellite imagery can be bought from serveral sources and no one cares. And countries of all types have been doing this for decades in plain sight. This is yet another distraction of the easily led idiot masses while our own "elected" offcials plunder the giant treasure chest that is america and voting in even stronger, fascist level contols on what we the people can do about about stopping them.

NOTES AND COMMENTS : 

(1)>>Why would they send a balloon to spy on the US? . Just How a "Chinese balloon " evaded NORAD is baffling . This poses a question , how secure American air space really is ??It’s a flex and a very clear message to the world. China proves they aren’t scared or worried about what the US might do while the US government carefully tiptoes around to avoid any escalations.So, this giant balloon that can be seen by with the naked eye somehow just appeared over Montana? This thing had to have been on radar for days before that. If it had been deemedc a threat it could have easily been shot down over the pacific.(2)>>The Pentagon said that similar incidents happened in the past and there were zero news stories about them, since worrying about minor things like rogue balloons is really stupid. do people really believe it's a Chinese spy balloon? if it was a spy balloon, it wouldn't even be on the news because the US would have secretly shot it down before it even got to Montana let alone Alaska. The US response to it could be strictly grandstanding propaganda, or it could be a real response to data exfil. If they had something that could more accurately sense the weapons count of silos to see if they're real vs fake, etc.I'm just curious how aware they were of this anomaly until it entered US airspace. Like, was Canada aware of it? The balloon, which the American government said it has been tracking since at least Tuesday, was moving east over the middle of the continental U.S. Friday, the Pentagon said. Authorities would not divulge details about its route other than to say it was spotted over missile-silo fields in Montana.The Pentagon’s public assessment is that the balloon’s intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities were of “limited” value, in terms of gathering data that China could not obtain through other means. However, it seems like part of its mission may have been to provoke the U.S. in retaliation for what China sees as irritating incursions into its periphery — in Japan, in Philippines and in the South China Sea. (3)>>American Military Industrial complex gearing up for war with China in 2025 . Peace is not on the MIND of the COMPLEX , but they are preparing us with the next wave of fear mongering . It’s gonna be hilarious when 2025 comes and goes and nothing happens.China hasn’t even begun practicing amphib ops at scale yet. They aren’t just gonna YOLO across the straight without having rehearsed this multiple times, which won’t happen quickly. Most likely timetable for a Taiwan invasion is late 20s/early 30s, with early 30s being the most likely. A conflict COULD happen earlier but that is extremely unlikely.Most of the mainstream Western articles I've read have been focused on the impending demographic collapse that South Korea and Japan are facing, and particularly how those governments are unwilling to solve the problem with more immigration or serious policies to make raising children more affordable. Given that the ROK has the lowest birth rate in the world, by some margin, this is an understandable focus.Vast majority of Western "experts" have literally nfc what they are talking about in regards to China. Hell I'm XiGang (for Bullet trains alone, catch the f up west), watch CCP conferences and even I struggle to tell you what China thinks. One of the main issues though is that very little Western pundits have any clue what Marxism or Marxist Leninism actually is, so don't understand the framework or world view the Chinese are politically working within. On top of that, you have literally thousands of years of Chinese Legalism/culture that Marxism is filtered through.In regards to Taiwan, it's a civilizational issue for China, Taiwan will be part of China again at some point, but that may be hundred+ years from now. China largely thinks in Civilizational time scales.(4)>>NORAD National Air defense with out a hiss . NORAD has been tracking the Chinese balloon at least since January 28th , it raises a lot of questions why WAS IT NOT SHOT DOWN BEFORE ? According to NORAD, the U.S. government has detected and is tracking a “high altitude surveillance balloon” that is over the continental U.S. According to a report by AP News, China has said the balloon is a “civilian airship used for meteorological research.” American defence officials recommended against taking “kinetic action” against the balloon, for fear the debris could threaten people or infrastructure on the ground. The official notes the balloon appears to be loitering over US airspace for longer than in previous incidents. The Pentagon reiterates it does not believe the balloon represents a significant intelligence threat.The object first flew over Alaska’s Aleutian Islands and Canada before appearing over Billings on Wednesday, officials said.Serious thought, I wonder if the US has flown high altitude spy planes, drones or balloons over parts of China - stuff we’d never know about - and if China is saying “See, if you can do it, so can we”, and if that’s playing into the reason why the US isn’t shooting it down (so China doesn’t shoot down whatever continues to be sent over it’s territory). Just a thought - it can be a whacky world.

Twitter Files & BIG PHARMA COVER UPS!

A RUNDOWN of the TWITTER FILES .

 (1)>>Elon Musk exposed the fact that pharmaceutical companies used Twitter and other social media companies to promote government lockdowns and to shut down discussion about low-cost covid-19 treatments, even for poor countries. Start with the premise that everyone knows that twitter has been working hand-in-hand with the government to suppress the truth and/or subvert democracy. Then turn off about 1/3rd of your brain cells, and read the files again.We are able to discern this even more clearly with the January 16 batch of Twitter Files, internal e-mails from the social media giant that expose Johnson & Johnson, Moderna and Pfizer as engaging in what journalist Lee Fang described as “a massive lobbying blitz to crush any effort to share patents/IP for new covid-related medicine, including therapeutics and vaccines.”  (2)>>The same FBI who called Hunter Biden’s laptop “disinformation” is now calling the Twitter Files “disinformation.”Twitter Files 16.0 reveals that powerful drug company lobbyists wrote to Joe Biden’s regime soon after it took power, demanding that the United States government “sanction any country attempting to violate patent rights and create generic, low-cost covid medicine or vaccines.” They didn’t just want to mandate their product on Americans; they wanted to all but mandate it on people around the world.  (3)>>Calling these rapidly deployed injections “vaccines” is charitable. In the midst of the epidemic and injection free-for-all, U.S. government health agencies literally changed the definition of “vaccine.” The term previously applied to “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” Now there is a new definition: “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”It’s still a for-profit product. It wouldn’t be bringing billions in profits to pharmaceutical companies if it wasn’t. But now it just needed to “stimulate” your immune system—and who knows to what end. Then it could be called a “vaccine” on social media and everywhere else.More information is coming out about how debilitating and even deadly these “vaccines” have been. Yesterday, (4)>>“thanks Pfizer” was trending on Twitter. Yet Pfizer seems to still have some ability to influence what you see. A few of the posts under that heading had to do with people suffering Pfizer covid injection side effects, but otherwise the trend was a stream of joke posts that Pfizer had caused people to dance badly or caused movie characters to spasm. Project Veritas baited one Pfizer scientist to admitting on hidden camera in 2021 that, “I still feel like I work for an evil corporation, because it comes down to profits in the end. … Basically, our organization is run on covid money now.” 

Pfizer SCANDAL .

 WAY BACK IN In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety.   NOW A new video from  (4)>>Project Veritas surfaced online and quickly gained traction, garnering over 7 million views on Twitter in the first 10 hours of its upload. The video shows a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, claiming that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” the virus causing COVID-19 through “Directed Evolution.”The reason for wanting to mutate the virus, Walker told an undercover journalist, was so that the company could stay ahead of the game and continue to develop vaccines.“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [coronavirus] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.Walker continued, “from what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [coronavirus mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious — obviously, they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”These are INCREDIBLE statements!! I love how these news people are stating SOO many times, soo passively, how this could ALL Be speculation and made up jargon. When this man on video ("IS") indeed verified, and clearly going into incredible detail about his very real career status. Project Veritas just saved millions of lives. These evil people need to be shut down and prosecuted. The "There There" is that manipulation of coronaviruses in a lab caused the pandemic in the first place, and now it is happening again (allegedly). It doesn't have to be a legal or optics question...it's just morality. These statements are OUTRAGEOUS!! People need to see this.

RELEASE THE KRAKEN !!!

Twitter Files 16.0 is more evidence of the same thing.Most social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter, however, either blocked sharing of the article or at least de prioritise it. (They had been warned by the DoJ beforehand that various bad actors like the Russians might be trying a disinformation campaign and this had those types of fingerprints all over it.) We have no idea what the incentives were for suppressing the story. It seems to me that the most likely explanation is that social media companies were on high alert after being used to spread Russian disinformation in the previous election. This tarnished their reputations and they obviously didn't want to be used in this way again. The Biden administration runs counter-disinformation programs with social media companies focused on COVID misinformation and election misinformation. These programs are legal, even when government employees ask a social media company to review a post for violating community guidelines. It's similar to what the Office of National Drug Control Policy did in the 1990s with promoting anti-drug propaganda in TV shows. The Trump administration ran similar programs that focused on attempts by foreign actors to interfere in US elections. The emails seem to count as evidence against the theory that someone at a federal agency specifically asked (5)>>Twitter to suppress the story or that Twitter suppressed the story to help Democrats. Instead, Twitter executives internally debated what to do about the story. 

NOTES AND COMMENTS :  (1)>>Elon Musk exposed the fact.  In its early days, when Twitter was at its most Twittery, circa 2012, executives called the company “the free-speech wing of the free-speech party”. That was the era when the platform was credited for amplifying the Occupy Wall Street movement and the Arab spring, when it seemed like giving everyone a microphone might actually bring down dictatorships and right the wrongs of neoliberal capitalism. While Musk might be hoping we see documents showing Twitter’s (largely former) staffers nefariously deciding to act in a way that helped now-President Joe Biden, the communications mostly show a team debating how to finalize and communicate a difficult moderation decision. It's clear from the context that Taibbi is implying such takedown requests from both parties were widespread. And certainly the fact that there were takedown requests by TRUMP implies that there were takedown requests other than the Hunter Biden story.(2)>>The same FBI who called Hunter Biden’s laptop “disinformation” is now calling the Twitter Files “disinformation.”The whole Hunter Biden story itself was a bit of a flop, but the context around it is more interesting and concerning. It is disturbing, if unsurprising, that those politically connected (on both sides of the aisle) and the gov have an ongoing relationship with Twitter's moderation team. I think the story is not "Hunter Biden", but "You weren't crazy to talk about active suppression of certain voices by politically connected interests".The biggest controversy of the story comes from Twitter's decision to temporarily suppress it, and the whole reason for that was the suspicious timing of it coupled with the New York Post's initial refusal to cite any of their sources or share anything from the laptop itself, meaning the story literally could not be verified by anyone. (3)>>Calling these rapidly deployed injections “vaccines” is charitable.  Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, are a fake charity . They don't work . A recent analysis found that more COVID-19 deaths now occur among the vaccinated, but it also stated that should not be seen as evidence that vaccines don’t work. Experts note that this shift was expected in part because more people than not are vaccinated, at least with their primary shots, and there are other factors, such as waning immunity among the vaccinated, also affecting the numbers. Additionally, unvaccinated individuals could have immunity from COVID-19 itself.Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19. And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission. Blaming the unmasked and “misinformation” Isn’t it obvious vaccines + masks DONT WORK??? In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, individuals with only a cough and positive lab test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion. that vaccine manufacturers have done little to dispel the notion that severe covid-19 was what was being assessed. (4)>>“thanks Pfizer” .Now that Pfizer had admitted that it does gain of function development on Covid to boost profits, should we assume they’ve been doing the same for the seasonal flu?How many billions did they make on flu shots? How many people have died from their engineered flu strains?Big pharma wasn’t worthy of trust prior to two years ago and they’re certainly not worthy of trust now.The pharmaceutical giant posted income of over $100 billion in 2022, the majority coming from Covid products, but it expects to lose out as the pandemic wanes. (4)>>Project Veritas surfaced online and quickly gained traction. Jordon Trishton Walker, identified as director of research and development for strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning at Pfizer, said in the video that the drugmaker is looking at mutating the virus to preempt the development of future vaccines, adding that the company’s ambitions are similar to gain-of-function research.In the video, Walker also discussed the similarities between what Pfizer is alleged to be doing with the COVID-19 virus and what may have occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, leading to a conversation about the so-called “lab leak theory” of the pandemic’s origin in China in late 2019.Additionally, Walker claimed that COVID-19 and its variants have been a “cash cow” for Pfizer and alluded to a cozy relationship between the company and federal health regulators. This Pfizer guy is a certified POS. Notice when he's backed into a corner he claims racism. FU dude.So Pfizer is saying “you guys are crazy, nothing is happening here”…..and that debunks the video? They can’t even confirm or deny he works there? What a sham.(5)>>Twitter to suppress the story or that Twitter suppressed the story to help Democrats. Instead. Yeah, so there does seem to be evidence that a government entity interfered in the 2020 election, but I do find it highly problematic and unethical that Twitter was apparently taking moderation cues from a presidential campaign and the DNC. That simply isn't appropriate. Imagine if Elon took these sorts of cues from his new Republican buddies and actually had his moderation team act upon them? No one would think that's appropriate or ethical. And as we now know, the Hunter Biden laptop story turned out to be completely legitimate. No one knew it at the time, but that's sort of the point - we just didn't know. Twitter censored a story they though might be fake, even though they had no evidence to prove as such either way. And it appears as though they used the hacked materials policy as an excuse, which they knew was pretty dubious. On top of all that, the hacked materials policy was always BS anyway, because by that standard a lot of legitimate journalism should've been banned from Twitter but wasn't.

CYNICALISM of GUN CONTROL.

California Gov. Newsom wants 
more gun control and more 
gun control as mass
shootings go on in a state 
with the strictest gun laws .

America has a serious problem . It's the plague of MASS SHOOTINGS . My heart goes out to anyone who’s a victim. Gun violence, domestic violence, random violence.  (1)>>California Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted the country’s failure to address gun violence on Monday, saying “the Second Amendment’s becoming a suicide pact.” Moments later he learned about yet another mass killing in his state, the third in eight days. (1.1)>>Newsom promised he would continue fighting for strong gun control laws, while also attacking Republicans for getting in the way of making the country safer. He singled out several by name, including Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy.  Meanwhile, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to ban “military-style assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines – a bill that would have outlawed the modified 9mm semi-automatic weapon used by (2)>>the gunman in Saturday’s mass shooting in Monterey Park. President Joe Biden has signaled his support for the measure.  Newsom What weapons of war were used?? Pull your head out of whatever sand pile it is in. Handguns were used. Are you surprised?  “I don’t want this to happen again”. Well, there’s been a shit ton. 33 mass shootings in 2023 so far. no, 33 days have not passed since new years.Last year we averaged 1.57 a day or 11 per week. We're on track though (by last year's data we'd be 34.54).What don't you understand. You flood the market with assault weapons, deprioritize mental health and then build a society that vilifies people who don't think like you. [ Through some MIND CONTROL IN] It's  (3)>>VERY CYNICAL that ANY KIND of EVEN MORE STRICT gun control is going to work , CASE in EXAMPLE = CALIFORNIA . It’s a very interesting case, California has the highest amount of mass shootings but has some of the lowest amount of death due to gun violence. The big thing is that mass shootings is the stuff that makes the headlines but is a tiny percentage of actual gun deaths. So the counter your looking for is that mass shootings is not very good evidence for how good a states gun control is.The point I’m trying to make is we can see first hand in our country that gun control doesn’t work. It’s societal issues we need to address and nobody is acknowledging that at all. People who want to commit atrocities will do so no matter .So our goal should be making sure people don’t want to commit atrocities not pushing them to more extreme means.And who the hell are these "Good guys with guns" I keep hearing about? The police are becoming less trustworthy with guns, and I am saying this as a white person in a town that has yet to have the cops randomly kill a minority on a routine arrest or traffic stop, and key word is yet. You'll excuse me if I think a roving band of citizens with guns dispensing justice is just going to lead to a staggering amount of murders that will do more harm than good. (4)>>So who are these "good guys with guns" who will save us from the bad guys with guns?Also the rise in mass shooters seems to roughly coincide with the decrease in serial killers. I think some a lot of it is the news covering mass shooters so much more than serial killers.While many say the psychology is not the same. People imitate what they know. How many would have taken the steps to go though with that form of violence if they hand been exposed to it so much. All gun control legislation is a political stunt without regard for the fact that more gun control will lead to more violent crime. Among their biggest con jobs, the left has managed to get its sheeple to believe "gun violence" is a problem, but "violence" is not.There are more guns in the US than human beings. I don't even know what the solution is any more. 

NOTES AND COMMENTS : 

(1)>>California Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted the country’s failure to address gun violence on Monday, saying. Newsom mentioned the role of mental health in mass shootings, but he singled out gun access as a factor exacerbating the problem."I'm really proud of the work we've done in this space, but we've had decades of neglect," he said. "But respectfully, I will submit that regardless of the challenges it relates to behavioral health, there's not a country in the world that doesn't experience behavioral health issues."  (1.1)>>Newsom promised he would continue fighting for strong gun control laws.  California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said that gun regulations were falling short as he visited the scene of the deadly mass shooting in Monterey Park.Gavin Newsom believes that this is his moment. He woke up with an idea. He clearly wants to run for President on the Democrat ticket for 2024, but his record plagues him. After being widely known as one of the most criticized, most morally bankrupt Democrat politicians known far more for his infidelity than his policymaking, but still hoping to run for the Democrat ticket in 2024, why not use faux concern for the victims of gun violence. He does not care one bit about the victims of gun violence, and is not passing this legislation as an opportunity to implement long-term, comprehensive gun control. H  Isn't it curious that with all these calls to criminalize guns there are District Attorney's in California that refuse to use firearm sentence enhancements for crimes committed with firearms!?!California has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Yet police said the Monterey Park shooter was still able to use a modified pistol, which is illegal in the state during the shooting that killed 11 people and injured nine others.Even with California’s laws, people can just bring weapons into the state from elsewhere — The shooter also could have obtained the gun legally out of state, or illegally from a gun trafficker. Neighboring states like Nevada and Oregon have clamped down on gun trafficking by requiring background checks in recent years. But Arizona doesn’t require background checks to purchase any type of weapon, which made it the largest out-of-state source of guns traced to California in 2021, according to data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.  (2)>>the gunman in Saturday’s mass shooting in Monterey Park.  Did news of one massacre set off the other? It reads that way, but who can know? Were mental health issues a factor? Maybe so, but there are similar mental health issues in all the countries where these kinds of shootings happen either very rarely or virtually never.If you’re looking for a more stereotypical shooting, there was one that came on the day between the two California mass shootings, this one in Des Moines, Iowa, where two were killed and one wounded, and an 18-year-old with a 9mm pistol and an extended clip was charged. We hardly noticed it.(3)>>VERY CYNICAL that ANY KIND of EVEN MORE STRICT gun control is going to work.  If we could prove that increasing gun control would lead to fewer deaths, yes, although through places like Chicago etc we learn that increasing gun control does not always make the world a better place. We have a right to own a gun because it is in our own Constitution just as other rights like the right to vote are. No, not everyone in the world has the right to own a gun. It is the constitution of the United States thus it is only applicable to US citizens.There is a difference between a responsible gun owner and a mass murderer. The issue is, it seems, we seem to have more mass shootings in this country that we have responsible gun owners. But that may be due to the fact responsible gun owners are not committing mass murder.Chicago's ban on in-city firearm sales predated the city's crime-spike by almost a decade. A great deal of Chicago's harsh guns laws were put into place in the early 1960s but Chicago didn't really become a "violent" city until the late 60s and early 70s, with 700-800 homicides per year throughout most of the 70s, 80s, and 90s. By the 2000s violent crime crashed in Chicago, and for the past decade, the number of homicides has been well under 500 per year, despite the fact that the city has a population double what it was in the 70s. This is all without repealing or changing those gun laws.(4)>>So who are these "good guys with guns" . I genuinely don't understand this fear. Gun owners are an incredibly powerful group. If they decided to pass some gun control/background-check to make illegal sales more difficult, they could easily do so without losing any power to stop the legislature from passing more restrictive laws. The concept of citizens stopping acts of violence – often called “good guys with guns” – originates back to the 1998 book, “More Guns, Less Crime,” by economist John Lott, VICE reports. The book and its arguments have been resourced for many gun advocacy groups, including the National Rifle Association. “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun,” NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre famously said after the Newtown shooting in 2012. LaPierre has repeated the line several times since. Every time there is another mass shooting, more and more money floods into the budgets of police departments and they go out and buy military-spec M-4 rifles and military-spec shotguns and military-spec body armor and military-spec helmets and military-style camouflage uniforms. Why? Because they're cool, that's why. If they're going to go up against one of these mass shooters, every one of whom is outfitted in military-style tactical gear and carrying military-style AR-15 rifles, then by God, they're not going to be one-upped! Just like Greg Abbott and his exhortation to Texans to buy more guns so they could catch up with California (!), the cops are going to buy more guns and more body armor — more of everything — so they can be ready the next time they're called upon to stand around in a parking lot of a building after 10 or 20 people have been shot and their dead bodies are strewn around the floor somewhere inside.So this idiotic question about where are the good guys with guns? They’re following the rules, and staying out of places where they’re not allowed with their guns, while the bad guys have free reign. And the rest of this idiotic question, about 30 mass shootings in 49 days? Wherever you got that, they’re smoking some good stuff. Stay away from that, because it’s screwing up your reality.

How COVID made AMERICA and the WORLD DUMB!

A Tiny Virus made America and 
the World DUMB !

Way BACK , February 2020 AD . The socall outbreak of  (1)>>Covid -19 played like a superstar on all network  TV mainstream news media That's what happens when globalists buy off the media to spew only their propaganda and nothing else. Lack of actual journalism is a real threat in any democracy..... (2)>>THE DAILY DIATRIBE. COVID has uncovered all that is wrong with us, our society, our values, our humanity. It has highlighted how we are self-righteous, keen to apportion blame, self-absorbed, unempathetic to the plight of others, void of reason, and the list goes on. Sure, the hotels were a debacle, the tracing wasn't up to fight, poor decisions have been made, but. how many world leaders have made poor decisions in battling this. Why has Victoria copped this so badly? For the same reason NSW, who let hundreds of COVID positive Ruby Princess travellers. Now we have been reduced to arguing whether (3)>>the lives of the elderly are worth protecting at the cost of possibly  (4)>>destroying our economy for years to come. We seem happy to ignore one other salient issue. The elderly are dying because they don't have the strength to fight the disease, yet by far the greatest cohort to acquire the virus, by far, is 20 to 39 y.o.The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. The one thing about this I don't understand -(5)>>Why are so many "scientists" afraid to talk about this possibility? Why did so many deflect away from this? etc etc .I don't see what they have to gain. Unless they just don't want to admit that this could have been a lab accident and that would make all of them look bad and threaten their future lab work or something.I doubt we ever find "proof" and the people who were on the ground are probably all dead by now. (5.1)>>And China probably destroyed all the evidence etc etc. So we will just have theories and studies and 'perhaps it did come from the lab".Follow the money. "Science" follows (largely federal) grant money. Grant money follows political regimes. The political regime has a policy of appeasement towards China. Meanwhile, direct payments to individuals (scientists and politicians and university administrators alike) permeate the ecosystem and corrupt it at all levels.Let's embrace a new concept: (6)>>'Smart Masking' ALL OVER AGAIN !! Where was flu or a cold during covid? Mysteriously vanished yet replaced by a virus with identical flu symptoms for exact duration. No scientific curiosity about it only silly comments that masks helped yet the mask box says otherwise. World wake up your critical thinking skills. The Omicron wave is receding, but..... (6.1)>>Democrats’ insane COVID policies Fauci just vanished . It seems reasonably obvious to me that were the health department actually encouraging more people to seek testing that positivity rate would drop well below that 5% threshold and there would be no plausible excuse for keeping schools closed. Way back in 2020 there was some data manipulation to inflate the numbers . RIGHT now its the reverse , now the numbers are being hidden. With mask mandates dropping all over the country and virus transmission rates falling as well, the future of our pandemic is starting to look a little brighter .  Alleged  COVID-19 ‘global pandemic’ has been the mysterious disappearance of the seasonal flu in medical and public health record keeping. It’s as if the Flu just vanished into thin air after being the most common perennial seasonal respiratory virus.Is there no flu this year or is flu “the second wave of Covid?”  (7)>>Don’t expect any honest answer from health authorities. They have the fear running strong, so strong that people are submitting to needless lockdowns that are causing economic havoc to their lives and to mask mandates that do more harm than good.What is it all about? Is it simply about vaccine profits for Big Pharma?More lockdowns? Put economies back on life support? What about all those profiteering billionaires? Shut borders? Close airports? Our leaders are running scared. 

NOTES AND COMMENTS :

(1)>>Covid -19 played like a superstar on all network  TV mainstream news media.  WE STILL GET THE DAILY FRIGHTMARE of the news about the dangerous variants of this covid virus . Talks of MOORE BOOSTERS . While we all have been distracted , pointed the finger at China , Wuhan lab as the possible leak of the COVID virus . That has always been part of the "conspiracy theory" . Yes, there is a lot of things we will never know how this pandemic was cooked up . The pandemic of the media! The media has fueled fear for two years now.Additionally, media hysteria in the face of COVID-19 and the new vaccines has gotten much worse.How many articles have we seen about COVID vaccines and the hope they present to the American public? Or how cases have begun to drop as a result?The simple answer is not that many because in the eyes of many newspapers, good news isn’t worth talking about. The reason why: it’s beneficial for them and their political allies to focus on other topics.I have suspected for a long time that we are the victims of mass panic.  (2)>>THE DAILY DIATRIBE. EVEN WORSE is hiding facts from the American public , using the main stream media to brainwash people into a corner of fear . Another factor that drove my skepticism was the daily covid numbers that started to appear on CNN . You know the daily count  how many people a day were "testing" positive .LONG BEFORE there were Covid Test Kits !What if the Chinese had not tested their patients for coronavirus or there had not been any test? Would we have carried on with our lives, without restrictions, not worrying about some deaths here and there among old people, which we see every winter? I think so.(3)>>the lives of the elderly. THE COVID INSANITY put elderly in nursing homes to exposure to this virus . REMEMBER that One?  Cuomo has been dogged by criticism for months over his March advisory directing nursing homes in the state to accept patients who had or were suspected of having COVID-19.As the virus tore through nursing homes, killing dozens at some of them, Cuomo came under withering censure. His administration’s policy, implemented with an eye toward freeing up hospital beds for an onslaught of COVID patients, seemed to disregard the risks to frail and elderly nursing home residents who were especially vulnerable to the disease. IT WAS a CRIME , but Cuomo got away with state murder in my view . (4)>>destroying our economy for years to come. The single most important thing people need to know about how COVID-19 has affected the economy is that federal aid really kept the wheels from falling off completely. Personal stimulus checks or unemployment allowed people to continue spending and keep some businesses afloat. Direct aid to state and local governments kept really harmful budget cuts at bay.You do realize if the economy collapses, we’re going to deal with deaths from that? Plus we’ll have no immunity to COVID, so we’ll have more people dying from that too?Economic recession kill people. The study from the great depression is the only one that went the other way but that was because people stopped working in extremely hazardous factories and it's not really applicable to today.The emphasis after the emergency first lockdown should have been on test, trace and separate the sick/suspected sick from the healthy. Locking up millions of healthy people will prove to be catastrophic for the economy, mental and non-covid illness and future prospects of millions. I also fear deeply the authoritarianism of future governments now they know how easily human social interactions can be curbed. We have lost much more than we currently realise in allowing these disastrous lockdowns.(5)>>Why are so many "scientists" afraid to talk about this possibility?   We’ve seen these types of tactics dozens of times before. Government officials repeatedly buried vital public health data about the pandemic during the Trump administration. To be clear, Americans have no obligation to take every scientist’s idea seriously. Misinformation about Covid-19 is abundant. From snake-oil cures to conspiracy theories about the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease, the internet is awash with baseless, often harmful ideas. We denounce these: Some ideas and people can and should be dismissed.At the same time, we are concerned by a chilling attitude among some scholars and academics, who are wrongly ascribing legitimate disagreements about Covid-19 to ignorance or to questionable political or other motivations.   NOW that the question of Covid’s origin has “mostly been tackled by people outside the mainstream scientific establishment.” People inside not only have been “disappointingly incurious” but have tried to shut down the inquiry “to protect the reputation of science as an institution.” The most obvious reason for this resistance: If Covid leaked from a lab, and especially if it developed there, “science finds itself in the dock.”The politicization of science leads to a loss of confidence in science as an institution. The distrust may be justified but leaves a vacuum, often filled by a “much more superstitious approach to knowledge.”  A letter signed by 18 scientists , said that both the theory that the virus spilled over from animals and the theory that it escaped from a lab “remain viable.”Even vocal proponents of the lab leak as a viable hypothesis are quick to dismiss theories that the virus is some sort of engineered bioweapon as far-fetched. Facebook, Google, and Twitter have engaged in multiple acts of censorship against scientists holding a range of views on COVID-19 and the public health response to it. This censorship sets a dangerous precedent — allowing large, unaccountable corporations to set themselves up as arbiters of not only acceptable public speech, but also of what constitutes acceptable science.(5.1)>>And China probably destroyed all the evidence etc etc.   If China destroyed the "evidence" , but home of the U.S. government was involved ? At issue is whether the National Institutes of Health funded research on bat coronaviruses that could have caused a pathogen to become more infectious to humans and, separately, if SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes the disease COVID-19 — transferred naturally from bats to humans, possibly through an intermediate host animal, or if a virus, a naturally occurring one or a lab-enhanced one, was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab. U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them, despite stipulations from a U.S. funding agency that the money not be used for that purpose.Grant money for the controversial experiment came from the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Anthony Fauci. people suggesting that the coronavirus was engineered, rather than having jumped from animals to humans, the explanation favored by most experts on coronaviruses. The uproar has also drawn attention back to a decade-long debate among scientists over whether certain gain-of-function research is too risky to allow.(6)>>'Smart Masking' ALL OVER AGAIN !! I had hoped that would be one of the silver linings in all this, that most Western countries would adopt the practice as a social norm too. And that might end up being the case in some of the more left-leaning/educated areas, but on the whole a disturbing number of people have been easily poisoned against doing a simple thing for the common good. F'n  bizarre, is what it is.It’s really surprising that if I go to the store 1 mile to the west from my home, it’s probably 90% mask compliance, but the store one mile to the east and it’s more like 10 or 15.As I’m standing in line, with about 10-15 other people, first one lady starts coughing. Then another, then another. Literally every person near me/in line was sick/coughing, and I was the only one wearing a mask. Frankly, I don’t care if people stare at me, or make fun of me. I HATE being sick, and masks clearly work.(6.1)>>Democrats’ insane COVID policies Fauci just vanished .  Three-quarters of the country — basically everyone but the lunatic wing of the Democratic Party — now accepts that Covid has become endemic. Those of us who doubted that mask madness and vaccine mandates would be effective were proven absolutely correct last month, when New York, a state that is more masked than a superhero convention and whose principal city has a Checkpoint Charlie–style regime of demanding vaccine papers from everyone, topped the coronavirus charts. The New York–media-safetyist complex wailed, “Well, it might have been worse!” Worse than everyone getting Covid?The political messaging is playing out during record-high and deeply partisan skepticism of figures like Fauci and federal agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While roughly the same share of both parties agree that the government was unprepared for the pandemic, more than half of Democrats say they trust public health officials. What has passed for "science" over the last two or three years largely isn't. Science is about honest and open debate. It's about questioning assumptions and conclusions. Censorship and demonization of contrary opinions is actually anti-science. If there is censorship going on, be wary of motivations and robustness of data. Additionally, public agencies have become corrupt. Fauci could be an excellent example. Accusing critics of being "anti-science" with a connotation of tinfoil-hattery is a classic propaganda technique. (7)>>Don’t expect any honest answer from health authorities.  COVID is now BIG BUSINESS  & a BIG CON JOB on the American people.Americans are largely divided into three camps: those that consider COVID-19 over, those that feel left behind by their peers, and those that still think there is a pandemic but are less bothered by it. Little consensus exists over whether key pandemic metrics like cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are increasing or decreasing. New figures from the Peoples Vaccine Alliance reveal that the companies behind two of the most successful COVID-19 vaccines —Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna— are making combined profits of $65,000 every minute. The figures based on the latest company reports are released as CEOs from pharmaceutical industry meet for the annual STAT summit —the equivalent of a ‘Big Pharma Davos’— from 16-18 November.These companies have sold the majority of doses to rich countries, leaving low-income countries out in the cold. Pfizer and BioNTech have delivered less than one percent of their total vaccine supplies to low-income countries, while Moderna has delivered just 0.2 percent. Meanwhile 98 percent of people in low income countries have not been fully vaccinated.That people aren't smart enough to understand waning efficacy and are jumping to conspiracy theories instead?That people aren't aware that 4 or 5 dose regimens for vaccinations aren't unheard of?Or that the initial 2 dose regimen barely even functions as 2 separate doses so we're really more like on our 2nd dose?Maybe drop the /s and have a conversation like an adult so I can actually understand what you're trying to say.My point is that, on one hand, you have an unprecedented pandemic in modern times that a lot of people have difficulty to grasp or even accept. On the other hand, a lot of the same (or not) people are sick of multinationals taking advantage of them and their ignorance about complicated subjects like medical care to make a profit. It's understandable that these people are reluctant, or even hostile to the whole thing in reaction. Take into account the trend for bipartisanship, and demonisation of "the other side", general fatigue of the public, and you get a clusterfuck like we've had for two years now.I am disappointed in the public health agencies / bureaucrats that negotiated the deals with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, without developing an adequate safety net/system. For example, reserving a portion of funds, having access to a team of qualified vaccinology/immunology experts (who are well versed in the mechanisms of vaccine action and spectrum of responses) that can be consulted.