Beware of "fake" Poll Numbers.
The "fake news" moniker, which has become a rallying cry for Trump and his supporters, surprisingly gained popularity across partisan lines, including among Democrats. Almost everyone in the mainstream press wrongly predicted the 2016 election outcome. "Years" later, the media doesn’t seem to have learned much from its mistakes. Now comes the vary polls are designed to trick people into thinking a certain way: that Trump is a HUGE failure and people are sorry they chose him. This mistake the elites make is thinking we, the people, do not understand this. So we get suckered with how much Trump has dominated the American media networks . (3)>>Even the so called anti- Trump drama , seems to bolster Trump doing just the opposite effect . It is a way to distract you from the what is really going on . Think back when Obama was President we have had nearly 10 years of Congressional bickering's. The Obama era saw the increase of Mass shootings . Cop's gunning down innocent unarmed black men . ] The propaganda machine took tragedies , then used them . This could be called a way to spread fear in our nation via media propaganda . If they want to live a delusional life, let them. That most Americans continue to doubt the accuracy of public opinion surveys is notable considering how that most pollsters performed historically well during the November midterm elections. They will continue to be disappointed in their polling with very real losses. As Americans hopefully will wake up.
Beware of "endless wars" .
NOTES AND COMMENTS
(1.1)Deeper State of THINGS Part 2.The concept of a deep state in America is not some kind of wacko conspiracy theory. It doesn’t refer to some cloaked cabal of Jewish elites who meet in the forest to sacrifice children and greet each other with esoteric handshakes as in the straw man that so many corporate media outlets are fond of attacking, but refers rather to the self-evident fact that unelected power structures exist in America, and power structures tend to form alliances. The donor class, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, big oil, the military-industrial complex, various aspects of the intelligence community, the corporate media, national security officials; all of these overlapping and interconnected groups undeniably exist, undeniably wield immense power, and are undeniably not elected by the American people. There is no factual basis on which to deny any of these things; the only thing that can rationally be debated is how they behave. The term “deep state” exists for use in that dialogue. (1.2)>>Nancy Pelosi is sitting on the Democrats’ articles of impeachment against President Trump. If the Articles never get sent to the Senate (unlikely), then the charges go uncontested. The president will have been impeached (not removed), and that will be that. It will hang over him through 2020 and beyond. His allies will have to defend those actions on the campaign trail. Theoretically, the stakes are highest for President Trump, though there is little chance that two-thirds of the Senate will vote to remove him from office. Instead, in many ways, it is Pelosi who faces the highest political stakes. Last year, Pelosi took control of the House after a sweeping Democratic victory in the 2018 midterm elections. With a clear mandate to counter Trump, she launched a half-dozen investigations of the Administration and issued hundreds of subpoenas for witnesses and documents. When the Trump White House took the unprecedented step of flouting every House subpoena, she took it to court. (2)>>centrist Republicans in the Senate. The longer Pelosi’s delay continues, the more attention these centrists will face. The Democrats believe Murkowski, Collins, and Romney are pivotal votes, and, thus, the questions will continue and the pressure will mount on them.Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) delay in sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate showed that Democrats “are in a total panic.” WITH No, the real explanation for Pelosi’s sudden flip is that those in the know — in the intelligence community, on congressional committees, and even in the Democratic mouthpiece media with their Deep State sources — warned her in early September of the potential political catastrophe that would ensue as a result of the devastating revelations in both the Inspector General’s report on the FBI’s abuse of the FISA process and U.S. Attorney John Durham’s more comprehensive investigation into the origins and perpetuation of the bogus “Russian collusion” narrative. (3)>>Even the so called anti- Trump drama , seems to bolster Trump doing just the opposite effect . However many pollsters have disputed this claim. A 2016 poll conducted by Morning Consult showed that Trump performed better in general election polls regardless of whether the poll was conducted online or by live interviewer over the phone. This finding led Morning Consult's chief research officer to conclude that there was little evidence that poll respondents were feeling pressured to downplay their true general election preferences. From a historical perspective, it is worth considering, too, that increased news media focus on negative advertising itself has helped accelerate this trend, creating a vicious cycle of attack politics driven by political consultants and journalists. (4)>> The triggering event is often a sudden crisis that galvanizes popular opinion and becomes the immediate occasion for military intervention. The truth is that Soleimani was not all that different from any of about five dozen current and former American politicians and bureaucrats — if anything, he was considerably more restrained about the use of force. Yes, he was involved in a lot of bloody wars — but so was every American president since 2000, and besides half the wars he fought in were started or fueled by the United States. It's just another instance of America's gigantic hypocrisy when it comes to war.
(1.1)Deeper State of THINGS Part 2.The concept of a deep state in America is not some kind of wacko conspiracy theory. It doesn’t refer to some cloaked cabal of Jewish elites who meet in the forest to sacrifice children and greet each other with esoteric handshakes as in the straw man that so many corporate media outlets are fond of attacking, but refers rather to the self-evident fact that unelected power structures exist in America, and power structures tend to form alliances. The donor class, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, big oil, the military-industrial complex, various aspects of the intelligence community, the corporate media, national security officials; all of these overlapping and interconnected groups undeniably exist, undeniably wield immense power, and are undeniably not elected by the American people. There is no factual basis on which to deny any of these things; the only thing that can rationally be debated is how they behave. The term “deep state” exists for use in that dialogue. (1.2)>>Nancy Pelosi is sitting on the Democrats’ articles of impeachment against President Trump. If the Articles never get sent to the Senate (unlikely), then the charges go uncontested. The president will have been impeached (not removed), and that will be that. It will hang over him through 2020 and beyond. His allies will have to defend those actions on the campaign trail. Theoretically, the stakes are highest for President Trump, though there is little chance that two-thirds of the Senate will vote to remove him from office. Instead, in many ways, it is Pelosi who faces the highest political stakes. Last year, Pelosi took control of the House after a sweeping Democratic victory in the 2018 midterm elections. With a clear mandate to counter Trump, she launched a half-dozen investigations of the Administration and issued hundreds of subpoenas for witnesses and documents. When the Trump White House took the unprecedented step of flouting every House subpoena, she took it to court. (2)>>centrist Republicans in the Senate. The longer Pelosi’s delay continues, the more attention these centrists will face. The Democrats believe Murkowski, Collins, and Romney are pivotal votes, and, thus, the questions will continue and the pressure will mount on them.Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) delay in sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate showed that Democrats “are in a total panic.” WITH No, the real explanation for Pelosi’s sudden flip is that those in the know — in the intelligence community, on congressional committees, and even in the Democratic mouthpiece media with their Deep State sources — warned her in early September of the potential political catastrophe that would ensue as a result of the devastating revelations in both the Inspector General’s report on the FBI’s abuse of the FISA process and U.S. Attorney John Durham’s more comprehensive investigation into the origins and perpetuation of the bogus “Russian collusion” narrative. (3)>>Even the so called anti- Trump drama , seems to bolster Trump doing just the opposite effect . However many pollsters have disputed this claim. A 2016 poll conducted by Morning Consult showed that Trump performed better in general election polls regardless of whether the poll was conducted online or by live interviewer over the phone. This finding led Morning Consult's chief research officer to conclude that there was little evidence that poll respondents were feeling pressured to downplay their true general election preferences. From a historical perspective, it is worth considering, too, that increased news media focus on negative advertising itself has helped accelerate this trend, creating a vicious cycle of attack politics driven by political consultants and journalists. (4)>> The triggering event is often a sudden crisis that galvanizes popular opinion and becomes the immediate occasion for military intervention. The truth is that Soleimani was not all that different from any of about five dozen current and former American politicians and bureaucrats — if anything, he was considerably more restrained about the use of force. Yes, he was involved in a lot of bloody wars — but so was every American president since 2000, and besides half the wars he fought in were started or fueled by the United States. It's just another instance of America's gigantic hypocrisy when it comes to war.
