Trump's coming STORM!

Remember Bill Clinton's storm : Monica Lewinsky.

The storm (s) had always hit Washington D.C. in the past  . I can't remember a good scandal like Bill Clinton's which had all disregard to ethics , morals , lying to congress over Monica Lewinsky. Former President Clinton was caught lying on tape as he addressed the nation back in 1998 . I always had my personal views about Clinton , he was a obvious womanizer , the "list" was extensive .  (1)>>His weakness perhaps , "in my theory" is  the Republicans laid a trap for him in the guise of Monica Lewinsky . The following below is what the news sources said about the affair . I interwoven it in my text . On January 1998, Lewinsky’s friend – (1.2)>>an older work colleague called Linda Tripp – invited her for lunch at a mall in Washington DC. Lewinsky was 25. They’d been working together at the Pentagon for nearly two years, during which time Lewinsky had confided in her that she’d had an affair with President Bill Clinton. Unbeknown to Lewinsky, Tripp had been secretly recording their telephone conversations – more than 20 hours of them. The lunch was a trap. When Tripp arrived, she motioned behind her and two federal agents suddenly appeared. “You’re in trouble,” they told Lewinsky. If the President of the United States was that gullible , it would not surprise me . Lewinsky was 22 when she began interning at the White House. She and Bill Clinton started flirting soon afterwards. One day she blurted out to him, “I have a crush on you,” and he replied, “Well, do you want to come into the back office?” Eventually, Clinton staffers noticed how much time she was spending in the West Wing, including at weekends, and so a deputy chief of staff had her transferred to the Pentagon, which was where she met Linda Tripp. Five days after the FBI sting, Lewinsky was outed by the online gossip site the Drudge Report, under the headline: “A White House intern carried on a sexual affair with the President of the United States!” Bill Clinton called her a liar, denying he had had “sexual relations” with “that woman”. Lewinsky, who has often said she’d “do anything to have my anonymity back”, was forced to testify before a grand jury. The 3,000-page Starr report, which included mortifying details of their nine sexual encounters, was released to the world. No offence , I beg your pardons . I read the recent (1.3)>>Vanity Fair magazine where Monica has painted herself a "victim" of Bill's , the honest truth , 22 years later , it seems to me that Monica Lewinsky was a plant to basically seduce a man who had already issues with his martial life . Bill Clinton pretty much ended up like Samson with Lewinsky as Delila .  It was such a dirty sneaky game that now has become the norm in Washington politics . I can't help feeling anymore sorry for Lewinsky as much as Clinton . Who were both manipulated used like puppets , later thrown in the little dirty book of American scandals . Such a ploy now   is already brewing another "STORM".
Donald Trump's Storm : Stormy Daniels.

Bill  and Lewinsky looked like the perfect political sabotage . As I explained above Bill was set

up . The perpetrators were the Republicans . While Lewinsky looked like the # ME TO innocent victim , she manipulated Bill using his weakness infidelity . Now Donald J Trump is another perfect patsy for the sane thing . For decades Mr. Trump had his pockets lined up with infidelity , cheating going back into the 1980s. He's no better than Bill Clinton , perhaps had more skeletons in the closest ,  than any wolf media outlet would love to surround him with , dig up dirt , perhaps get the same end result like Bill:IMPEACHMENT . Back in January, the Wall Street Journal reported that Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and all-around fixer, had set up a shell company in Delaware in the fall of 2016 for the sole purpose of passing a (2)>>$130,000 payment to Daniels (whose real name is Stephanie Clifford). Soon after, In Touch magazine published an interview with Daniels in which she detailed how she and Trump had an on-again, off-again affair in 2006 that began in Lake Tahoe just after the birth of his son Barron, when his wife Melania was back home in New York. This  Sunday night when 60 Minutes airs a highly anticipated interview with Anderson Cooper. The sit-down concerns the affair she says she had with Donald Trump in 2006, and her lawyer has promised that it will reveal salacious new details about the dalliance. The "lurid" details are a bit laughable if you compare Clinton's cigar , stained blouse .  According to 2009 emails between political operatives who were at the time advising Daniels on a possible political campaign, the adult film actor and director claimed that her affair with Trump included an unusual act: spanking him with a copy of Forbes magazine. South Carolina congressman Mark Sanford is one of the few Republicans to comment. He told the Washington Post the claims are "deeply troubling". "If it was a Democratic president and hush money had been paid in the campaign, would there be a series of hearings going on?" Mr Sanford asked. "I think you could probably point to a fair number of indicators that suggest there would be."

Conclusion : 

Is Donald Trump being blackmailed ?
The First Lady don't look
happy .

It was so easy to entrap former President Bill Clinton decades ago with Monica . For Donald Trump its extremely hard to hide anything  . Remember that Bill Clinton faced impeachment proceedings after lying about his affair with staffer Monica Lewinsky. The Trump lawsuit against Daniels is vary troubling . Here a sitting American Presdient paid off a woman to keep an affair from being made public . Daniels may face more than US$20 million in damages for violating a "hush agreement" that requires her to remain silent about an affair she alleges she had with US President Donald Trump in 2006 and 2007. This "hush money" has serious legal implications . The special counsel is specifically tasked with investigating potential collusion between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, as well as "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation." Yet several white-collar crime experts told CNBC that Daniels' lawsuit, filed against Trump on March 6 over a deal barring her from discussing an alleged affair, raises questions and opportunities for the Mueller probe. Either way it has the hall marks of  blackmail . Daniels is blackmailing Trump right now; she wants to expose her version of what happened between them. She "claims" that Pres Trump did not sign their non-disclosure agreement. The combination of the Trump administration’s unwillingness to disclose sensitive information and its total incompetence is gravely dangerous. We’ve gotten to the point where it’s no longer about whether they’re above the law, whether they’ll go to jail. It’s about whether they are going to drag the rest of the country down with them. 
NOTES AND COMMENTS: 

(1)>>His weakness perhaps , "in my theory" is  the Republicans laid a trap for him in the guise of Monica Lewinsky . Monica Lewinsky is what the CIA and the KGB used to refer to as a "honey trap" -a temptress that is used to blackmail the enemy. The only mystery surrounding Lewinsky is to what extent did she cooperate and to what extent was she manipulated by Tripp and Goldberg? Not surprisingly, the only "insider" who has gone public to talk about Lewinsky and Tripp is Goldberg, the old pro who has evidently survived a dirty trick or two under the tutelage of Richard Nixon. Like the Lewinsky affair, the consistent element of the Willey incident is the dirty tricks that produced it. One can rest assured that if the Willey incident was at all credible, Starr would have indicted Julie Hiatt Steel for perjury and then, he would have had a clear, unadulterated case of perjury against the President of the United States, who denied the Willey allegations under oath, without qualification. But Starr's office obviously knows that these charges are not credible or they would have been pursued even more aggressively than the relatively minor Lewinsky allegations. Indeed, simple logic betrays the frivolity of the Willey allegations, not to mention the secret dirty tricks of the Lewinsky matter. Is it not safe to assume that when Lewinsky is discouraged from speaking to the media, there is an ulterior motive at play or does anybody seriously believe that Starr's office is simply trying to spare the President the embarrassment? The truth ultimately surfaces and while cunning lawyers and liars can explain it all away, it invariably survives. The simple fact of the matter is that if the Willey allegations were serious, Isikoff would have promoted them so passionately, that he would have delivered the media fantasy to produce the Bob Woodward of the 90's. The public relations blitz to criminalize the President of the United States doesn't even pass the laugh test, and it cannot possibly be confused with a legitimate investigation which has no agenda beyond the determination to expose the truth. If we and most of the media were not in a position to judge the credibility of reports about the ******-stained dress, it is because most people had nothing to do with the scheming to produce a "honey trap". But let's not get carried away here and claim that the Willey allegations are any more credible simply because we are not privy to every single detail regarding the plot to destroy the Clinton Presidency. We may not know everything, but we stand firm on what is exceedingly obvious. (1.2)>>an older work colleague called Linda Tripp – Tripp may have helped trigger the Lewinsky scandal, but tales of her manipulations may now be key to Clinton's counterattack. Readers can turn to this old TIME MAGAZINE WEB PAGE for some startling allegations [ http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/1998/09/28/clinton.starr.html ] Its far too long for me to process here , but it contains much to the point I am making.(1.3)>>Vanity Fair magazine where Monica has painted herself a "victim" of Bill's . Lewinsky writes about how she had come to view her affair with Clinton as “a consensual relationship” — and how all the women (and men) now speaking out about sexual misconduct have given her a “new lens” through which to see her own story. How can she be a victim? White House intern Monica Lewinsky was not the naive victim of Pres. Bill Clinton, but rather a victim of relentless sexual exploitation by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.  (2)>>$130,000 payment to Daniels. This scandal isn’t her first brush with politics. Following revelations that Louisiana Sen. David Vitter hired sex workers, Daniels, a Louisiana native, in 2009 formed an exploratory committee to run against him the following year. She declared herself a Republican, and made the FairTax, a proposal to replace most federal taxes with a 30 percent national sales tax, the centerpiece of the campaign. But in June 2010 she dropped out of the race, saying, “like Gov. Palin, I have become a target of the cynical stalwarts of the status quo.”