James Comey may have lost Hillary Clinton the election with an announcement in the final days of campaigning – but failed to announce that it was looking into damning rumours about Donald Trump. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times reported that Trump was angry that Comey had not pursued the source of the leaks, which have been a major concern of the Trump administration since the inauguration. President Trump’s decision Tuesday to fire FBI Director James Comey didn’t just throw the White House into chaos and amplify uncomfortable questions about the administration’s ties to the Russian government — it also threatened to derail the entire Republican agenda. Still, the Comey news and the search for a new FBI director is an unexpected complication. Trump will need to nominate somebody, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings, and then the full Senate will have to vote. It took nearly two months for recently confirmed Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb to go from being nominated by Trump to being confirmed by the Senate.Senate Democrats could make that process uncomfortable for Republicans, if they wanted to. The Senate relies on “unanimous consent” — the united agreement of Republicans and Democrats — to proceed on usual business like committee hearings and routine floor votes. (1)>>Comey was in my opinion was in cahoots with the GOP to keep Hillary from being elected , but also he was the "leak" that sent Hillary's e-mails to wiki-leaks . I base that on two suspicions that just prior to November 9th Comey put out what appeared to be more e-mails found in only two email chains containing classified information were manually forwarded from Abedin to Weiner. Ten other chains with classified information were also found on Weiner's laptop, but are believed to be the product of a backup of her personal electronic device. Strangely as it seems after the FBI investigation into Clinton's private email server just days before the 2016 presidential campaign. Less than two weeks before election day, the FBI informed Congress new Clinton emails had been found on a laptop belonging to Weiner. Somehow these "e-mails" wound up in the hand of Wiki-Leaks. The Cohootness of the whole GOP {Republicans- Trump coziness} may be summarized after Donald J Trump while on the campaign trail blasted away (2)>>invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails , asking one of America’s longstanding geopolitical adversaries to find “the 30,000 emails that are missing” from the personal server she used during her time as secretary of state. “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."
Hillary's Paper Trail to NO WHERE ! {e-mail debacle }
Well for now . The e-mail scandal is going to get replaced with the Russian investigation ...
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
Hillary's Paper Trail to NO WHERE ! {e-mail debacle }
When Hillary Clinton's e-mail scandal began it was just a lot more going on than we would suspect . Hillary never sent or received classified material, she said so, so why doesn't everyone just accept that? Mrs. Clinton was drawn into President Obama's foreign policy failures in the Middle-East . The Arab Spring of 2011 , finally Benghazi . The Republican's cried afoul in Washingtonian politics demanded justice and an immediate investigation as to whom knew what regarding the lost lives in a Embassy attack . While it is true that the Obama administration stood idle during the attack . I think while so much of the "heat" was taken off Mr. Obama , a whole lot of the pressure was put on Hillary as Secretary of the State. It was in my opinion that Hillary never called the shots during the Benghazi attack , but rescuing the people in the embassy was under the authority of the Commander-in - Chief . (3)>>President Barack Obama found himself drawn into Hillary Clinton's email controversy as the White House acknowledged the State Department was withholding a set of messages Obama and Clinton exchanged during her four years as secretary of state. You have to remember that the Republican's were after Mr. Obama , drilling him over Benghazi. They wanted to extract some "impeachable" evidence against Obama through Hillary's e-mails . While as ridiculous as it seems about the e-mail controversy , it lingered through out Mr. Obama's term . Investigation after investigation nothing was found by the FBI . The second phase into Hillary's e-mails entered when Mrs. Clinton was running for President. This is pretty much how low House Republicans were stooping so low to investigate Mrs. Clinton . They knew that she was a popular candidate for the Presidency , her chances of winning were high . So digging the dirt was the option of the GOP against Hillary , and the e-mails now were the focus against her . An a new investigation was started , the greatest political sabotage ever acted in American History . In all interests Comey's actions before the November were suspicious . Democrats have blamed Comey’s handling of the inquiry into Clinton’s use of a private email server, and (4)>>his late-October public letter about the case, in part for her loss to Republican Donald Trump.
Well for now . The e-mail scandal is going to get replaced with the Russian investigation ...
Washington D.C. is heading for some pretty strange "investigations" in the coming months.We will be switching from Hillary's e-mails to Trump's e-mails . YES TRUMP'S !. I think its like a satire , first they subpoena Mrs. Clinton's in ongoing frivolous investigations . Next the Trump -Russia collusion . Such investigations can take anywhere from days to months, depending on the complexity of the circumstances. There could be some testimony by Comey . It's interesting that President Trump threatened him via Twitter in reagrds to some "tape recordings" . WiKileaks is also now going after the Trump- Comey tapes in some rigor as Watergate . "Everybody's convinced: They say there is no collusion," Trump said. (5)>>"There is no collusion. We had nothing to do with Russia."But the President said it is "very important" to him that the question of Russian meddling in the election is resolved."I want to get to the bottom if Russia or anybody is trying to tamper or play with our election," Trump told Fox News' Jeanine Pirro. My Opinion again is that I don't believe that Russia put Trump in the White House . Every aspect of this election, and all the factors that swayed it, should be thoroughly investigated. We, as a country, know that we are not that ignorant to elect a person like Donald Trump to run our country without the help of outside influence, whether it's Vladimir Putin, James Comey,Unfortunately, a big percentage of the country IS this ignorant.Comey acknowledged publicly in March that the FBI was looking into possible coordination between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, and he said the investigation had begun in late July. Comey said that for a counterintelligence probe, “that’s a fairly short period of time.” Trump is the first president since Richard Nixon to fire a law enforcement official overseeing an investigation with ties to the White House. Its going to be wild goose chase would that be? Russia is THE wild goose chase. How about we investigate something where actual evidence exists, namely within our political system.
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
(1)>>Comey was in my opinion was in cahoots with the GOP to keep Hillary from being elected , but also he was the "leak" that sent Hillary's e-mails to wiki-leaks . Deep antipathy to Hillary Clinton existed within the FBI, multiple bureau sources , spurring a rapid series of leaks damaging to her campaign just days before the election. Anyone who was halfway interested in the election in the fall of 2016 knows that this is a big lie in so many ways, but specifically because the MSM totally ignored WikiLeak’s dump of Podesta emails before the election.The MSM did not share Podesta’s emails before the election and now the head of the FBI just announced that the Russians did not give these emails to WikiLeaks. This confirms what WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in November – that his group did not get emails related to Hillary Clinton’s campaign from a “state actor.” What is so crazy about this is the "timing" of the leaks correlating with Comey's own announcement prior to the November 8th is vary suspicious . (2)>>invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails. Did Mr. Trump commit Treason ? by ASKING RUSSIA to hack Hillary's server ? Trump’s camp realized pretty quickly that he screwed up, and sent out this tweet shortly after the press conference ended. Trump tried on a new one . “Of course I’m being sarcastic. And they don’t even know frankly if it’s Russia,” Trump told Fox News. “They have no idea if it’s Russia, if it’s China, if it’s somebody else. Who knows who it is?. It's interesting we never heard NOT ONE SINGLE GUST OF WIND OUT OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY Congress . No peep from Sen . Paul Ryan . Trump had invited Treason in our election system ?. If I had been his "advisor" I tell'em, please Mr. Trump shut YOUR MOUTH !. If Russia was anyhow involved in our election , the whole FAKE NEWS part of was started by President Trump . So these Senate Hearings/ Committees that are supposedly investigating Russian collusion in the Trump's administration could be perhaps putting on a good show . Hardly any Special Prosecutor would have to be hired to "REALLY INVESTIGATE " . ITS Likely that nothing will ever come out of it , since it involves the entire Republican party elite . (3)>>President Barack Obama found himself drawn into Hillary Clinton's email controversy . The book, titled, 'Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign,' says about Obama, "He couldn't understand what possessed Hillary to set up the private e-mail server, and her handling of the scandal — obfuscate, deny, and evade — amounted to political malpractice." However, the two authors, Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, also point out that Obama did try to show his support in the form of a pep talk as they were en route to their first campaign rally together in July 2016. He reportedly told Hillary, "It's a four-month sprint to the end, and it will go quickly. It's hard and it's tiring. But this is a different stage than the primary." This was around the same time that FBI Director James Comey had announced that her use of a private email server had not broken any laws but was, in his words, "extremely careless."Nevertheless, the controversy would continue to dog her throughout the remainder of the election.According to the Washington Post, "She and her campaign are convinced that Comey was the pivotal factor — and there is evidence to support that view." In late October, Comey announced that the investigation into Hillary's emails was possibly going to be renewed. (4)>>his late-October public letter about the case The FBI director, James Comey, has placed himself in the crosshairs of a federal inquiry into whether he has interfered in an election. His letter { https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3198222/Letter.pdf } to Congress . Mr. Comey's letter said that the F.B.I. would review the emails to determine if they improperly contained classified information, which is tightly controlled by the government. Senior law enforcement officials said that it was unclear if any of the emails were from Mrs. Clinton’s private server. And while Mr. Comey said in his letter that the emails “appear to be pertinent,” the F.B.I. had not yet examined them.By the end of a day that brought stinging criticism of Mr. Comey from both Democrats and Republicans, he appeared on the defensive, saying in an internal email to bureau employees that he had felt obligated to inform Congress, and “we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails.’’ Again nothing was found to indicate that Hillary Clinton was doing anything wrong , but only the fact was she was using a personal sever rather than a Government one . (5)>>"There is no collusion. There is no collusion? I put a theory that there is some kind of collusion within our own Government as far as election tampering . My question is , how did the Russian manipulate Americans to vote for Trump ? . Were our electronic voting machines hacked , or was the electoral collage in collusion with the GOP { perhaps this is more logical} I am trying to straighten out peoples thinking on this , so many of my friends are only seeing Russians as at the polls , rather a more innocuous conspiracy of Republicans who detested a woman as President , yes Mrs. Clinton was not liked because of her connections with her husband Bill . It seemed that the culprits had to size the election to put Mr. Trump in office at any cost over Hillary .
No comments:
Post a Comment