Why Mueller's report got Burned .

" No Proof of Collusion .................."

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) on Sunday dismissed any of the potential findings that could be revealed from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, saying that  (0)>>"we can just burn" his final report.  AS FAR as Mueller's report as I said before [  see shorturl.at/aL249 ] that " Finding a crime , putting it together  in a nutshell with 500 to 1000 pages of "details" of what, when and where is going to make the American audience sleepy " .  We now know how William Barr,  (1)>>Donald Trump’s handpicked attorney general, decided to summarize Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Russia scandal. Barr received Mueller’s report on Friday, and two days later, released a four-page summary that brought a “feeling of euphoria” to the White House. But as important as the attorney general’s memo is, a combination of factors – its brevity, Barr’s credibility, questions raised by the attorney general’s specific wording and conclusions – have only intensified the need to see the special counsel’s own document. Beyond the initial reports that the special counsel has not recommended any additional indictments, the contents of the actual report, or whatever information the  (1.2)>>Justice Department and Congress ultimately allow the public to see, remain unknown. However a lot of (1.3)>>Bob Mueller's report was "leaked" out for 2 years. The New York Times reported that it had obtained a list of nearly 50 questions that Mueller has submitted to President Trump’s lawyers. The questions explore what Trump knew and felt about several figures involved in his campaign who’ve been indicted or implicated in some way in Mueller’s probe.  Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein have concluded that “the evidence is not sufficient” to charge Trump with obstruction of justice. But as a letter written by Barr to the House Judiciary Committee Sunday (summarizing the still-confidential Mueller report submitted to Barr and the Department of Justice on Friday) makes clear, that was Barr and Rosenstein’s decision — not Mueller’s. Trump is already claiming that Barr’s letter is a “COMPLETE AND TOTAL

........No Collusion  !!Witch hunt !! 

EXONERATION” proving there was “no obstruction.” But it’s important to understand that Mueller didn’t draw that conclusion; Barr and Rosenstein did.This, of course, came several hours before the release of Bill Barr’s summary, at which point Trump World abandoned its don’t-trust-Mueller talking points, and instead insisted that Barr’s assessment of Mueller’s findings must be accepted at face value. (It also came three days after Nunes and 419 other members of the U.S. House voted for a resolution calling for the public release of the special counsel’s findings.) The path to Mueller’s conclusion, of course, was so littered with troubling evidence that it took him and his investigators two years to walk it, and along the way they proved criminal deceit by several of Trump’s closest associates. However so let's first just hear what Muller says on this core issue of whether or not there was a conspiracy between Trump and Russia Muller says this quote "the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities"  and Muller takes a very expansive view of what coordinated could mean it's not just Express but also even tacit coordination so that right there is an unambiguous rejection of the conspiracy theory that has dominated our politics for the last two-plus years. Twenty-four hours after Attorney General William Barr announced his summary of Mueller’s findings, Washington’s main players continued to stew and snarl in ways that suggest the historical significance of his inquiry will lie partly in his conclusion but just as much in the fractious way it is being

......BUT WAIT there is Proof of Collusion !!!!

received.Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said he wants to keep investigating—this time, the people who promoted the Russia investigation in the first place. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said his fellow Californian,  (2)>>Democrat Adam Schiff, [ i feel sorry for this guy ]  who has been outspoken in alleging Trump-Russia collusion, should resign as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee; at the White House, Kellyanne Conway said he should quit Congress altogether. Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress and on the presidential trail sounded a consistent refrain: They won’t buy conclusions from the Mueller probe until they see his full report, not simply Barr’s summary. Every Republican on the House Intelligence Committee is calling on Chairman Adam Schiff to resign . At a hearing Thursday, Republican Rep. Mike Conaway read a letter arguing Schiff has been "at the center of a well-orchestrated media campaign claiming, among other things, the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government."A visibly emotional Schiff, who did not know this broadside from Republicans was coming, had a strident response. At times raising his voice, he listed a litany of known and controversial interactions between the Trump campaign and Russia — including Donald Trump Jr.'s involvement in the Trump Tower meeting and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort's sharing of polling data with a Russian associate."You might think it's OK," Schiff said. "I don't."

SO Was Mueller's investigation a hoax?
I just want to ponder on this . IS it possible that the whole investigation was just a put on ? (3)>>What makes me wonder is that in 2 years of probing that no written document was produced at the moment of concluding the investigation . Regarding the April 6th release of the "report" , the fact that Barr only gave a summery of it contexts means only that its instu for publication , most likely a redacted version will be issued to the public. President Trump said Friday he believes if the forthcoming report from special counsel Robert Mueller is an “honest” report, it will characterize the allegation his campaign colluded with Russia as a “hoax.”  NOW I am saying that Mueller was maybe working for Trump all a long  as part as a elaborate cover up to publicly clear Trump of Collusion charges. While the "evidence" for Trump's "business" relations with Russia exists . It seems a bit odd with the exception of Cohan's testimony that Trump was trying to build a Hotel  tower in Moscow. Mueller's questionable indictments did not correspond to the allegations of "meddling" . It just makes no sense . But the whole investigation to me looks more like a government cover up of some kind . Mueller could have reported no collusion after a month or two, he certainly knew there wasn't any by then. He kept it running ot help the Democrats win the house. Pure scam! "So, did Team Mueller, in or out of the grand jury, investigate or interrogate Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, or the Clinton campaign and DNC operatives who paid for the dossier?" "A cover-up is an attempt, whether successful or not, to conceal evidence of wrongdoing, error, incompetence or other embarrassing information. In a passive cover-up, information is simply not provided; in an active cover-up, deception is used." (Wikipedia) Now, the Mueller investigation is a continuation of that cover-up. It’s a deception campaign. It’s designed to take everybody’s eyes off the ball. It’s the same way magicians do it. They focus your attention away from the illusion, away from the so-called trick, where you don’t see what’s actually happening ’cause they’ve got your attention diverted.

Last Thoughts...

The House Intelligence Committee was a center of partisan fighting over Trump’s alleged Russia ties even before Mueller began his investigation, developing a reputation for discord and sniping during the GOP-led Russia probe that said there was no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. As of now April 6th , 2019 AD. Mueller's  report will be out. The News media will be there dissecting even the redacted parts.  What constitutes “proof” of “collusion” depends on how one defines those terms.  Even before Trump, the Justice Department’s handling of leak investigations was both draconian and arbitrary. Low-level officials bore the brunt of the investigations under the Bush and Obama administrations, while powerful, high-level officials were let off with almost no punishment. Disclosures of classified information happen daily in Washington, and so the Justice Department’s process for deciding which leaks to target has always reeked of politics and favoritism.

NOTES AND COMMENTS: (0)>>"we can just burn".  "So the Mueller report -- a lot of people, 'Oh what does it say?' We can just burn it up. I mean, it is a partisan document." BWAHAHA Like you wanted all that stuff about "the other side" burned up, right? How can he say it is a partisan document when 1, the special counsel was appointed by a republican and B a republican conducted the investigation?To top it off, Mueller left it up to the AG to make the obstruction prosecution or declination decision to someone he knows should have recused himself.Many keep commenting how Barr was barely on the job, auditioned for it with his memo, was conflicted, etc. but have left off that he should have recused himself. For this reason Mueller should have taken the additional step to make this decision and either let Barr concur or overrule him.   (1)>>Donald Trump’s. while Trump faces very real crimes from the SDNY[ Sovereign District of New York]   , he's effectively emerged scot-free from impeachment territory. Trump faces legally questionable, yet personally humiliatin,g campaign finance violations from the SDNY, but the special counsel has essentially cleared him of every non-process crime he faced in the Russia investigation, leaving not one stone of campaign-era "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" that any reasonable legal mind would consider grounds for impeachment. The president remains in legal jeopardy for two separate payouts to silence two of his alleged former mistresses, Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. If the SDNY memo sentencing Michael Cohen is correct, then Trump did direct his former personal attorney and fixer to issue a payment in exchange for a non-disclosure agreement to Daniels and orchestrate American Media, Inc.'s catch and kill purchase of life rights from McDougal with regards to her affair with Trump.Whether these payments, immoral as they are on the outset, are criminal, remains to be seen. Trump's attorneys will likely rely on the John Edwards defense.    (1.2)>>Justice Department and Congress ultimately allow the public to see, remain unknown.   The fight to make Mueller's report public could be fierce and possibly spark a court battle between Congress and the executive branch. Key House Democrats have said that the full report that Mueller submitted to Barr should be made public, and they intend to subpoena for the document -- and Mueller's underlying evidence -- if it is not handed over to Congress. White House lawyers, meanwhile, expect to have an opportunity to review whatever Barr intends to submit to Congress and the public.  (1.3)>>Bob Mueller's report was "leaked"         Federal prosecutors say confidential material given to a Russian company charged by special counsel Robert Mueller was altered and released “as part of a disinformation campaign” to discredit the Russia probe. What is CURIOUS is for 2 years the left wing news media seems to have "info" daily 24hrs on Trump , most notorious was MSNBC which skipped news about the atrocities, bombing in Yemen over every kernel of Mueller leaks to keep the hoping masses of a criminal  indictment of Trump. AFTER the results of the "report' OF  course the CNN and MSNBC networks had  BIG a crash. Well either the networks were fed a bunch of B.S. by the government to instill a bunch of misinformation to public is to be seen at a glance. (2)>>Democrat Adam Schiff. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., May have been working on a revenge plot of some kind since 2016 , he is much known for ripping the  Republicans , for calling on intelligence officials to deny Hillary Clinton briefings as a consequence of the FBI investigation into her emails, calling the demand "as predictable as it is absurd." Remember Schiff was vary much involved in the Clinton E-mail scandal, he was trying to obstruct a Republican investigation that was what was reported as the "hacked" DNC servers that wound up being erased . Schiff is vary much part of the shady Clinton -Trump - Mueller trio whos paths crossed over the last four years . At times, incoming Chairman Adam Schiff, California Democrat, and colleagues have hailed dossier writer Christopher Steele for predicting events. A close examination showed his assertions already had appeared in the press. Other Steele allegations embraced by Democrats remain unproven publicly more than two years after he started submitting memos to his Democratic handlers  For more than two years, Schiff has led the fight to make the Russia-collusion narrative stick. Schiff is still working to hold up the increasingly waterlogged tent of the “collusion” story. He will have to manage public expectations in order to avoid embarrassment when Mueller finally reveals the lack of grounding for charges that the Trump campaign did any of the things Schiff has spent two years insinuating it did.For example, just as we were never told exactly what “the Russians hacked the election” means, Schiff is now playing word games with “collusion.” In an interview this month, he claimed that just talking to the Russian government about building a Trump Tower in Moscow constituted “collusion.” This malleable definition of collusion could come back to haunt him. Because “collusion” appears to be exactly what Schiff has been engaged in while desperately trying to keep the fake Russia-collusion narrative alive.    But the jig may finally up. Since special counsel Robert Mueller did not find that Trump campaign associates had colluded with the Kremlin ?????, according to a letter sent to Congress by Attorney General William Barr, Republicans believe Schiff's continued investigation of Mr. Trump and his associates is an example of congressional overreach, and they accused him of abusing his position to "knowingly promote false information."Pelosi calls Republicans "scaredy cats" for pushing Schiff's resignation.          (3)>>What makes me wonder is that in 2 years of probing.   In his letter, Attorney General William Barr wrote that the Special Counsel’s Office “employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communications records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing the use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses.” All of this lasted 675 days and cost tens of millions of dollars.