2018 midterms Geo- Political map . This map says a lot about the future of 2020 election . The nation i |
If this map don't change by 2020 Donald Trump might win a second term. |
NOTES AND COMMENTS:
(1)>>Waking up to the stark reality that our two party system is a failure . If the midterm elections in America were a movie, they’d be a psychological horror fetish flick. A hogtied electorate is approached by two parties, each promising freedom if only the bound electorate will pledge complete loyalty. One glance at the wrong “saviour” and the deal is off. Sadly the twist is that, in the end, neither party frees the captive.The US is a one-party nation: The Plutocrat Party. It has a left-wing of the socially liberal and a right wing of the socially reactionary but when it comes to money, taxes and power it is the same party whose only allegiance is to the plutocrats and the megacorporations. Until the US voters understand this, they will continue to be exploited and reduced to peonage as the Plutocrat Party destroys the middle class. That this realization will occur is unlikely, however, and the imperial republic of the United States will continue its downward spiral into a banana republic with a ruling junta of plutocrats, financiers and megacorporation CEOs.America is not the land of the free, it is the land of the enslaved masses, who are coopted into a designed system of taxation and commerce set up to serve the interests of a ruling plutocracy.. It doesn't matter who you vote for.. Until people recognize this and start thinking about a sustainable future, the outlook is bleak.(2)>> the first BLUE WAVE.In 2008 . Barack Obama is the first president-elect in 32 years to receive a Congress under the firm control of his party, a powerful political gift that bodes well for the enactment of an expansive Democratic agenda. Starting January 2009, at the beginning of the 111th Congress, in the month that Barack Obama was inaugurated president, the House of Representatives was made up of 257 Democrats and 178 Republicans. There is no question that Democrats had total control in the House from 2009-2011. Even with numerous “blue-dog” (allegedly fiscally conservative) Democrats often voting with Republicans.....Speaker Pelosi had little difficulty passing legislation in the House. The House does not have the pernicious filibuster rule which the Senate uses. A majority vote in the House is all that’s necessary to pass legislation, except in rare occurrences (treaty ratification, overriding a presidential veto).An aside....it was during this time that Obama’s “stimulus” was passed. No Republicans in the House voted for the stimulus. However, in the Senate.....and because Democrats didn’t have “total control” of that chamber.....three Republicans.....Snowe, Collins and Specter, voted to break a filibuster guaranteeing it’s passage. Then in April, 2009, Republican Senator Arlen Specter became a Democrat. Kennedy was still at home, dying, and Al Franken was still not seated. Score in April, 2009....Democratic votes 58. The truth....then....is this: Democrats had “total control” of the House of Representatives from 2009-2011, 2 full years. Democrats, and therefore, Obama, had “total control” of the Senate from September 24, 2009 until February 4, 2010. A grand total of 4 months. So what exactly was done ? The Congress was so shackled trying to pass the Affordable Care Act which took up everything the government was supposed to do , it began a decade of new gridlock . By 2014 voters had enough and sent Obama a clear message ( Like they did to Trump now .Lol!) by voting again the Republicans ! (3)>>The populism , putting America fist was not a bad idea . Putting America first can mean many things . I think that putting the People ahead of politics is better . RESTORING THE AMERICAN DREAM as it fades away with the burden of high taxation , un-affordability of our living standards have not kept up inflation . Today, after the financial crisis, the shrinking of the middle class, the partisan warfare can be overcomed It is time for a new party who honestly represents the needs of working American men and women. (4)>>Donald Trump's far right moves are vary suspicious . When I first heard that Donald Trump was a "Republican " I was laughing really . He was embraced by the Evangelicals to the extant that they forgave his past sins . Now that Republicans have allowed themselves to be formed into the personal party of Donald Trump, forget the TEA PARTY . Trump has energized a large segment who are on the far right of the spectrum. The Democrats have not unified their beliefs regarding where they should be positioned on the left of the spectrum. Hopefully, most Americans reside somewhere close to the middle and democracy will prevail. (5)>>how historic some of the Democrats’ wins were. Obviously the Democrats have more diversity of women and ethnic representation that appeals to what we call minorities . The Republican base is vary weak on diversity. Democrats may be fielding a more racially diverse slate of candidates than ever before, and they acknowledge they are more dependent on nonwhite voters to deliver their victories. So far in 2018, 13 women have won gubernatorial primaries, 198 women have won House primaries and 19 women have won primaries in U.S. Senate races. That number took a jump this week with three more women securing their party’s Senate nominations. (6)>>2020 Presidential election held now. On the remade electoral map, Republicans have the built-in edge. If Trump can hold most of the states he won in 2016, he’s well on his way to victory. Meanwhile, the list of Republican states that Democrats can hope to flip is short. While Democrats reclaimed the House in the midterm elections, there’s a real danger of overreach that comes with renewed heft in Congress. The party has already planned extensive investigations into alleged corruption, among other schemes, to confound Trump. Trump’s electoral base wouldn’t mind a handful of ideological betrayals since rank-and-file Republicans are really here for the culture war stuff and not for the concrete policy anyway. So Trump would enter the 2020 campaign with his base intact but also with the brand as a freethinking moderate who’s at odds with the right wing of congressional Republicans. Democrats would end up nominating someone with a relatively extreme rejectionist profile, and Trump would be in a good position to improve his approval ratings and get reelected. (7)>>Democrats , the Republican party are both failures , they are failing Americans It is time for the voters in the USA to establish a multiparty system such as in the Northern European countries and Germany, where the people select candidates, not based on the thickness of their wallet but on the social and economic agendas, be it protection of nature, affordable housing and education for all i.e. creating equal opportunities for all to succeed in life etc. Multiparty system creates consensus through compromise while two-party system has led to confrontation and destructive partisan behavior in the governance of the USA...
No comments:
Post a Comment