What the next President Needs to do . 2013 AD.

Who ever wins . In my Opinion has to do these , or America will
sink by 2020.

Who ever get's to win this election . President Romney or President Obama , they are going to have to do what I am about to summarize . How be it to some of my readers who will think that my controversial statements here will stir the mind with apathy , but I have have it with how our American political system has disintegrated our the last "decade" . Over that last few debates I jotted down some points from either "political party" my IDEAS are cross Party , and some are of my own.

1st. The NEW President needs to address "job" creation , if our nation is going to  make it "globally" America has to restore industry here . Pay American workers a decent wage in order to make a living . Americans' average pay will trail inflation over the next three years, as it has for the past three, a slight majority of the economists say. The tight job market means many employers feel little pressure to raise pay. And rising prices for food and gas could swell inflation and reduce purchasing power . Get people back to work by making them work . This might be Socialistic , but FDR has a better record than Obama on this one , but it took him 12 years to do it.

2nd. Reinvent a new tax code , close those "loopholes" that allow jobs to be shipped overseas, so that American jobs are created here with a fair form of taxation for businesses .The next president, for example, could help lift growth and reduce unemployment by backing lower individual and corporate taxes and looser business rules, more than 70 percent of the economists say. They think such policies — the core of Romney's economic message — would be more likely to help than would Obama's plans for more spending on public works and targeted tax breaks for businesses. 3rd . Open up America for oil drilling , our nation needs to shore up it's oil supply as well as "invest" in other forms of energy . Work on expanding the "keystone pipeline" 4th. Create "affordable housing" while BIG GOVERNMENT bailed out the BANKS , the Little guy with his family was left with debt . I never heard either Obama or Romney for a matter a fact say anything about affordable housing . Yet 5th, we have had them both spout about "affordable healthcare" in America . Which Obama's health care plan is a Crock of Sh ** Sorry but how can you call it the affordable care act? When this last month Health Care costs just Jumped 9.5 % for no apparent reason . Insurance companies are blaming the Presidents plan to the rise in costs . My point here is I am sold on the "single payer " plan , and believe that Mitt Romney was right on letting the States set up their own Insurance plans , but the issue of bringing cost down MEANS NOT KISSING A to the insurance companies who are still reaping profits at the risk of patients. 6th . SECURE OUR BOARDERS .  It's not just illegals sneaking in , could be terrorists with nukes! 7th. EDUCATION  "revise NCLB" . Create Career orientated education , make Higher Education affordable. Stream line the big Department of Education .  8th .Whoever wins the U.S. presidential election will likely struggle to manage the biggest economic threats he'll face. That's the cautionary message that emerges from the latest Associated Press Economy Survey. An even more urgent threat to the U.S. economy, the economists say, is Congress' failure so far to reach a deal to prevent tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect next year and possibly triggering another recession. Yet as President Barack Obama has found, the White House can't force a congressional accord.And whether Obama or his Republican challenger Mitt Romney wins Nov. 6, he'll likely have to deal with one chamber of Congress led by the opposing party. Polls suggest the Senate will remain in Democratic hands after the election and the House in Republican control. 9th. We need to get off the "made in China" to "made in America " , why are American goods being made in China?  10th . Europe's recession will persist deep into the next presidential term, according to a majority of the 31 economists who responded to the survey. A weaker European economy would shrink demand for U.S. exports and cost U.S. jobs. Yet there's little the next president can do about it.An even more urgent threat to the U.S. economy, the economists say, is Congress' failure so far to reach a deal to prevent tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect next year and possibly triggering another recession. Yet as President Barack Obama has found, the White House can't force a congressional accord. And whether Obama or his Republican challenger Mitt Romney wins Nov. 6, he'll likely have to deal with one chamber of Congress led by the opposing party. Polls suggest the Senate will remain in Democratic hands after the election and the House in Republican control.

NOTES AND COMMENTS:

When President Obama ran for office in 2008, he promised to fix the economy, but he didn’t anticipate two things. First, the economic mess that the Republicans left him was far worse than anyone thought. Second, he couldn't know that the Republicans in Congress, and at the state level, would oppose every effort to improve the economy for fear that it might help get him re-elected. In spite of these two things, he has managed to stabilize the economy and start it on the road to recovery. There is even evidence that the job market is improving. Do voters have such a short memory that they can be conned into electing a Republican who will take us back into another recession? "Consider the record. In 2011 and 2012 the House passed more than three-dozen economic or jobs-related bills and with only a few exceptions they died in the Senate without a vote. The bills dealt with regulatory relief, tax reduction, domestic drilling for energy, offshore drilling, a jobs bill for veterans, repeal of ObamaCare and many more. Many passed the House with significant Democratic support...""Then there is the Democratic failure on their constitutional obligation of passing a budget. House Republicans passed their budgets in each of the past two years in the spring...By contrast, the Senate failed to pass any budget in 2012. Or 2011. Or 2010. The Senate hasn't passed a budget in more than 1,200 days. Sorry, you can't blame that on a Republican filibuster, because it takes only 51 votes to pass a Senate budget resolution. In 2011 and 2012 the Senate Budget Committee never even drafted a budget...""The Senate also failed in 2010 and 2012 to pass a single appropriations bill. According to an analysis by Senate Republicans, that hadn't happened before in the 150-year history of the current spending process. This year the Senate even failed to enact a national defense authorization bill, which almost never happens. The House passed a bill to avert the tax cliff looming in January, but the Senate failed to act on that too."Now, tell me again which party you think did "nothing."