Will Trump survive till 2028 ?

Will Trump Survive to 
2028 AD ? 
We are heading into a uncertain 
territory.

I feel like trying to understand and interpret Trump's mind and decision making can now be considered a college level course due to the scope of hypocrisy Trump brings to the table. In which case, the problem isn't just what he does and doesn't do, the problem is that he's impossible to read accurately in the first place. I think Trump's most vital Presidential survival tactic, has hinged on putting someone even less desirable in the VP seat. I didn't respect Pence, until January 6th, 2021, when he finally showed his spine but, I still wouldn't want to see him in the Oval office. Vance is a child, who can't even keep a straight face. If you follow the down line of successors, it only gets more dangerous. I suppose we have to ask the question of who life gets more dangerous for, in the event that both Trump and Vance find their way off the map, to realize your assessment is not entirely off base. Speaker Johnson becoming president frightens me for the exact reason Pence did and, our new Oligarchy benefits more from their agenda. 

2026 AD LAME DUCK WARS.  

Donald Trump's return to the White House in 2025 marked a stunning political comeback, with the US president pushing an aggressive MAGA policy from trade to international relations. While the US leader has shaped the events of a turbulent 2025, the new year may prove harder to manage for Trump as the midterm elections approach. Declining, drowning in illegal migration, losing its identity, victim of poor economic policy and too much regulation, the US has painted a bleak picture of its historical ally. Meanwhile, Europeans recognize the fundamental nature of the relation could be changing forever - but the extend and speed could be determined by the midterms. From tariffs to migration, from inflation to healthcare, from bashing Europe to knocking down parts of the White House: majorities of Americans feel an uneasiness about Trump’s attempts at reshaping US politics according to his own views. Latest polling shows many Americans have begun to blame Trump for high prices of everything from food to housing - and that it’s beginning to shift political sentiment. Almost half - 46 percent - say the cost of living in the US is the worst in memory, a view shared by 37 percent of 2024 Trump voters, according to a poll by Public First from mid-November. The poll also shows 46 percent of respondents believe those high prices are Trump’s responsibility. So, if nearly half of Americans say they find groceries, utility bills, health care, housing and transportation difficult to afford, there is at least a problem of perception. But Trump stubbornly insists that there is no problem, that prices have actually come down, sticking to his almost messianic belief that the economy will take off next year. We now have an unpredictable decision maker in the highest position of power on earth, that alone is what makes his administration so dangerous. Despite the propaganda coming from every corner. 

Trump second Term is Weak , your going to see crazy stuff coming.

Trump is delusional. Midterm elections are coming and Trump/Israel First candidates will lose. Trump will be a lame duck president and he will be impeached. I think the Trump era ends when he leaves office (as long as nothing happens to him) on January 20th, 2029. I think MAGA pretends to like JD Vance. I’m sure he has his actual fans out there, but I think MAGA pretends to like him because Trump picked him. I think Vance runs in 2028 but gets absolutely demolished by his competition, whether it be Kamala again, Gavin Newsom, AOC, Pete Buttigieg, Tim Walz or a new face.

A Third Term before the Asteroid Hits Earth ?  2 billion people will be able to see 'God of Chaos' asteroid Apophis when it buzzes Earth in April 2029 . While scientists prepare for making the most of the Apophis event, Binzel stressed that the event will not endanger the planet. "I want you to take away three things," he said. "Those three things are: Apophis will safely pass the Earth. Apophis will safely pass the Earth. Apophis will safely pass the Earth."  Meanwhile... President Donald Trump and his allies have been talking about his serving for a third term of office, in direct contravention of the 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution’s categorical bar: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” But, unlike in Trump’s first term, recent comments from some of Trump’s allies suggest that an actual strategy to overstay in the White House may be in the works. For instance, in a recent Economist interview, Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon said that “there is a plan” for circumventing the 22nd Amendment that would be laid out at an “appropriate time.” How much longer will the 'Trump era' go on for?So Donald Trump just got sworn in as president for the second time and its kinda crazy to reflect how long American politics has been in the Trump era since 2016.  Kinda crazy how long it has been. Trump has pretty much been the first thing on everyones minds when it comes to American politics, whether its his crazy antics or the pretty bad stuff he has done (Capitol etc.) Even during the Biden presidency, Trump has dominated news everyday. Even before he was president in 2016 he has been everywhere in American politics (Personally I watched a lot of Apprentice 😂). Trump's second presidency will end in 2028, does people forsee him still hanging around and still dominating American politics and pop culture? Will he start pushing his children to get higher positions in politics? Will he pull another stunt like the Storming of the Capitol? Currently the narrative is that Trump is a threat to democracy, a wanna-be dictator, and someone who is just looking to further his power. Ive even heard some say trump will abolish elections so he could be the leader of the US for the rest of his life. (im not saying this is true or false, only that this IS what his opposition is pushing) Trump's demise would throw half the nation into a blood-chortling frenzy, crying out for revenge--while the other half rushes to the liquor store to stock up on champagne. He has survived five assassination attempts so far, by my count (including a creative but laughable scheme to overturn his limousine with a forklift). America had roughly 13 million people in 1828, when Andrew Jackson--the first president to fend off a would-be assassin--was first elected. Today, we have around 334 million, and every occupant of the Oval Office since Richard Nixon has survived at least one assassination attempt during his career. It now comes with the job.I wouldn't bet my annuity on Trump's odds of surviving four years. But I don't necessarily think that the culprit will be a radical with a gun. Instead, my mind wanders back to Franklin Roosevelt in 1945 or former Vice-President Nelson Rockefellar in 1979. Trump seems more likely to take his final bow in Mar-a-Lago, with a smile on his face and an aspiring adult film star lying next to him. I don’t think Trump will finish his term; he’s all but being *Weekend At Bernie’s*’d around as it is. I don’t have any idea how he’ll die or what happens after he dies, but I think it’ll happen within a year or two. Frankly, I’m disappointed with that likely result; BUT HE'S LITERALLY Going out with with a bang 🥺, the Future of America is uncertain.

Trump's Venezuela Debacle

Forgive me for being a dumb , who doesn't know much about politics etc... but am i missing something? Because it looks like the US has just invaded another country, bombed it, presumably killing people, maybe even non-combatant citizens? taken their leader prisoner and is now claiming they're going to take over that country, how is that not either a war, a crime or both? Shortly after declaring that United States would “run the country” at a news conference, Mr. Trump seemed to suggest that his plan was to pressure Mr. Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, to simply obey him.Look, when the U.N. charter was written, eighty years ago, it included a critical prohibition on the use of force by states. States are not allowed to decide on their own that they want to use force against other states. It was meant to reinforce this relatively new idea at the time that states couldn’t just go to war whenever they wanted to. In the old world, the pre-U.N. charter world, it would have been fine to use force if you felt like drug trafficking was hurting you, and you could come up with legal justification that that was the case. But the whole point of the U.N. charter was basically to say, “We’re not going to go to war for those reasons anymore.” We’re still in the early hours, but the arguments that have been made in the run-up to this full-scale effort have largely focussed on self-defense against drug traffickers, who they claim are being supported or maybe even directed by Maduro and his administration. The problem is that that really doesn’t work under international law. There is a right of self-defense under the United Nations charter, which allows states to use force in self-defense against an armed attack. But it’s never been used for something like drug trafficking. And so all of these boat strikes that have been taking place over the past couple of months, which have been justified as self-defense, don’t fall within anything that anyone would recognize as self-defense under international law. Self-defense generally requires that there’s actually an armed attack. And it seems like they’re making a similar argument here to justify the capture of Maduro and the use of force on land in Venezuela. That raises the question of how the U.S. president intends to run Venezuela if Ms. Rodríguez balks. Mr. Trump has not said how this could happen and on what legal basis, leaving multiple experts in international and national security law puzzled.It appears to violate the United Nations Charter, a treaty the United States has ratified. Under Article 2(4) of the charter, a nation may not use force on the sovereign territory of another country without its consent, a self-defense rationale,  the authorization of the U.N. Security Council.Boggles my mind that post-Iraq people have made the serious argument with Iran and now Venezuela that quick actions that take out a leader or a military target are going to inevitably lead to pro-US regimes taking over previously hostile countries and that pro-US populations will just appear on the ground that will go along with whatever the US wanted. Maduro's regime is still intact. His allies still control all the security services. Iran's regime still has an iron grip on local military and police forces. Even if DT's people don't know it, there is no way for them to secure Venezuela or anywhere else with a hands off approach unless they have a ton of boots on the ground...otherwise they need to put them there. Trump didn’t attack Venezuela because it produces fentanyl. It doesn’t. He didn’t attack Venezuela because President Nicolás Maduro controls the Tren de Aragua gang. He doesn’t. He didn’t attack Venezuela because Maduro is the head of the Cartel de los Soles. It doesn’t even exist. In 2003, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney at least pretended their illegal invasion of Iraq and toppling of Saddam Hussein wasn’t about Iraq’s oil. It was about democracy! WMDs! Al-Qaeda!Donald Trump, weirdly, shamelessly, and luckily for us, has been brutally honest on the subject of Venezuela and his motivation for regime change in Caracas.

It’s about the oil, stupid! Continued bombing and assaults alone either strengthens the local regime because an outsider is attacking them...or the systems in place degrade to a point where the country collapses into civil conflict. During the "drug boat" strikes, he consistently shifted the focus to Venezuela's oil, falsely claiming they "stole from us" by controlling their own resources. This reveals the true agenda; it was never about drugs or security.