HE IS BACK ! THANKS TO THE DEMOCRATS |
This is what we call a “moment of truth” in the truest sense of the term. That moment where you’re forced to stop out of the echo chamber and take in how large the gap is between belief and reality. If you were shocked by this result, I would take some time to sincerely speak to others who don’t hold your views. If you expected a landslide, good job, but keep your beliefs accountable and remember to reckon with the differences in your expectations of a Trump presidency now vs. what he will have accomplished by 2028. WE WARNED YOU ----WE WARNED YOU this was going to happen four YEARS AGO !The Impact of Trump’s Landslide is Still Yet to be Felt .Exemplary and moved, Kamala Harris gifted Donald Trump what he had deprived Joe Biden four years earlier: She admitted defeat. On Wednesday, November 6. The hysterical reaction to the US election, not only on social media but in the mainstream media, is the fallout from a failed biopolitics, in which the body of the voter has been targeted with innumerable thee. The hysterical reaction to the US election, not only on social media but in the mainstream media, is the fallout from a failed biopolitics, in which the body of the voter has been targeted with innumerable threats. For months, a powerful confirmation bias dominated the Democratic camp and most commentators. It was based on the idea that every excess, every incoherence of Trump was proof of his extremism – an extremism the American people could not, in good conscience, accept. The fact that Harris' presidential campaign centred on countering Trumpism showed a lack of genuine interest in tackling issues important to minority groups. Democrats actually benefitted from Trump's rise, which presented an opportunity for them to win votes freely by positioning themselves as the only alternative to outright fascism. It failed this time, but this is the new technique of politics. Threats. It failed this time, but this is the new technique of politics. There is no doubt that the collective rage among liberals over losing the election to Trump comes from a place of cognitive dissonance influenced by American exceptionalism. How could the US - a beacon of liberal values and justice - elect a racist, misogynistic, xenophobic, convicted felon as its president? Yet, rather than taking this opportunity to examine the many issues within American democracy and society - ranging from structural racism to economic inequality, monstrous foreign policies, and the malign influence of money and multinational corporations on politics - liberals are taking their frustrations out on disenfranchised communities. THE LEFTY DEMOCRATS IMPLODED without CONSIDERING some facts WHY TRUMP WON and WHY KAMALA HARRIS LOST . The scale of Trump's win was a shock to the system for Democrats, many of whom have suggested that Biden running for reelection before making the decision to drop out of the race in July may have doomed their hopes of retaining the White House. Harris led among women by an average of 11 points. That’s a decrease from the 15 point lead Joe Biden commanded in 2020 and Clinton’s 13 point lead in 2016, according to a Washington Post average of October national polls. Harris shed support among women compared to her Democratic nominee predecessors, despite being lauded as the candidate of The Girls. She was a pretty poor candidate. Biden should have done the honourable thing about a year or so ago and announced he wouldn't run again. Give the Democrats a chance to pick a candidate with a chance, For those in a hurry: (a) Harris was rumbled as a phoney; (b) she focused on the wrong things; and (c) women can think for themselves and weigh up what's best for them, their families and the country. Who knew? The definition of a blowout win in modern times is Obama's 2008 victory. For Trump win probably DID occur, but he could sweep all the swing states plus New Hampshire and Minnesota A HUGE victory is large enough. That would get him to 326 electoral votes to 212 for Harris.THAT WAS PREDICTABLE MONTHS AGO !!! Biden did not explicitly pledge that he would not seek reelection during his 2020 campaign, although he did hint at the possibility by describing himself as a "transition candidate" and a "bridge" to a younger generation of Democratic leaders. While the president changed course and announced that he would likely run for reelection only months into his term, he faced immense pressure to drop out this year following a disastrous debate performance with Trump on June 27. THE BIDEN FALLOUT BLAME GAME is going right NOW. It’s also plausible that millions of women didn’t want to elect a vapid cipher as their first female president. Clinton, for all her scandals and shenanigans, was one of the most cunning women in politics. She had genuine talent in rhetoric and strategy. After Biden’s abrupt ouster at the eleventh hour, Harris had the herculean task of proving herself to an already skeptical public. She skipped the primary process without a single vote cast, ascending to the nomination without demonstrating that she was qualified. Just like men, women could clock Harris as an impostor. Harris’ team and media could still claim that the women who voted for Trump suffer from internalized misogyny, or promote the idea that women can be sexist against women. In reality, many women’s reasoning was simple. Their lives were better under Trump, rendering hollow Democrats’ warning that their rights would be revoked under a second term. I was not surprised to hear that the Harris supporters quickly said people didn't vote for her because she is a woman and of color. Imagine always having that excuse in your pocket all the time.Your boss tells you to do something you do not want to do and you can come back with “This is because I am a woman of co lour isn't it?” It is such a cheap, lazy excuse to blame either Clinton’s or Harris’s failure on misogyny. Always someone else’s fault. No, it was because Clinton didn’t bother to hide her contempt for anyone who wasn’t her, and Harris is frighteningly incompetent. If Condoleezza Rice had run, she would have won in a landslide. Donald Trump, the victor of the election, offered to help pay off the Democratic Party's campaign debt. In a social media post, he surprised expressed that the Democrats didn't have a surplus of funds left after raising a record amount during the 2020 presidential race. I am very surprised that the Democrats, who fought a hard and valiant fight in the 2020 Presidential Election, raising a record amount of money, didn't have lots of dollars left over. Now they are being squeezed by vendors and others. Whatever we can do to help them during this difficult period, I would strongly recommend we, as a Party and for the sake of desperately needed UNITY, do. We have a lot of money left over in that our biggest asset in the campaign was Earned Media. , and that doesn't cost very much. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Trump wrote. The left can’t bear to think they lost and therefore throw accusations around of misogyny and racism. Everything for the left has to come down to identify politics, it’s never about talent and who’s best for the job, it’s about virtue signalling. It’s wonderful to know that Americans saw through the endless propaganda and voted for someone with a plan, as opposed to someone whose only plan was to not be her opponent.With a presidency that was perceived as being sub par, left leaning voters who wouldn’t vote Trump and progressive voters who were reluctant to go Harris both had less enthusiasm and turned out less. Trump’s side hasn’t really lost any of their passion for him, and as a result turned out in force once again. I think no matter which Dem, it would have been hard to win. Inflation kills admins. This parallels Jimmy Carter vs Reagan. Carter and Biden had economic crisis and an aggressive Iran. This is when "strongmen" like Trump and Reagan come to win elections. Didn’t help Harris was a dud even in 2020. People should have seen how really unpopular she has been. She also had a lot of misses during her campaign. You can only run on feelings for so long, and focusing on trump when she should have focused on being a strong voice about her own policies would have helped. Every other word she said was Trump or threat to democracy. It feels like her words became noise. BUT focusing on trump when she should have focused on being a strong voice about her own policies would have helped. I think this is why she faded so hard in the last 6 weeks according to polls. She went hard negative, and who does that motivate? No one in the world was sitting there thinking, "Man, I'm not sure if I think Trump is a good guy or not, but if I hear a democrat insult him for the 9001st time I'll finally agree." Plus it rings hollow when they kept exaggerating or reading his words in the worst possible light. Dude was president for four years, people already have him as a given in their minds... you job has to be to convince them that you exceed that level, not that that level was actually way worse than they remember. For anyone shocked by this, they are not understanding of Maslow's hierarchy of needs and are in a bubble preventing them from seeing, most people care about being able to afford food and safety more than they do about the social issues. THE CRASH HAS ALREADY BEGUN. The U.S. has already entered into severe recession, the auto industry is going bankrupt, the housing industry is going bankrupt, the steel industry is going bankrupt‚ the banks are going bankrupt! The 23rd largest bank in all the United States & the largest bank in all Philadelphia is going bankrupt, & the U.S. is trying to bail it out—another big top bank of the Federal Reserve System‚ one of the biggest U.S. banks! I think the Democrats need to stop with the moralizing. You can't threaten to take away gas stoves, heat, and put people in EVs using million/billionare spokespersons that fly around in private jets. You can't tell people when inflation is going crazy that we need to stand with Ukraine. I think the covid restrictions were damaging to democrats as well, when no gatherings were ok, but then when people protested it was OK because racism is more dangerous than covid or however it was presented. You can't present a sub par president, and bad economic as the greatest president ever and an economy that's going great. You can't dress up a terrible candidate and act like she's the greatest thing ever and democracy will be over if she doesn't get elected. The democratic party is out of touch and needs to reset to more grounded concerns of the middle class and not call their opponents supports clingers, deplorables, garbage, or Nazis. At some level the Democratic party needs to call out all of their liars from within that have been gaslighting everyone for years now. Multiple news sources are now projecting that Trump will win a second term as president.His anticipated Electoral College victory comes on the back of major battleground wins in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia. But what many didn't anticipate was a Trump victory with the popular vote as well. If the projections hold, he'll be the first Republican candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years.Naturally, many questions about a second Trump presidency remain: How will this affect his ongoing lawsuits? Will the Republican Party secure the House/Senate/Presidency trifecta? If so, what laws are they looking to pass? If such a definitive victory holds, how will the Democratic Party adapt in the future?